From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: vxlan: when lower dev unregisters remove vxlan dev as well Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 13:01:18 -0800 Message-ID: <20140110130118.1893fcc3@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> References: <1389386780-24827-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Borkmann Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f177.google.com ([209.85.192.177]:37670 "EHLO mail-pd0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751691AbaAJVBV (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jan 2014 16:01:21 -0500 Received: by mail-pd0-f177.google.com with SMTP id q10so5028084pdj.36 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 13:01:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1389386780-24827-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:46:20 +0100 Daniel Borkmann wrote: > +static int vxlan_lowerdev_event(struct notifier_block *unused, > + unsigned long event, void *ptr) > +{ > + struct net_device *dev = netdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr); > + struct vxlan_net *vn = net_generic(dev_net(dev), vxlan_net_id); > + > + switch (event) { > + case NETDEV_UNREGISTER: > + /* Twiddle thumbs on netns device moves. */ > + if (dev->reg_state != NETREG_UNREGISTERING) > + break; No. Don't look at reg_state here. If moved from namespace then it is a good as gone.