From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] packet: use percpu mmap tx frame pending refcount Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:16:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20140114.171634.1073334641652236373.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1389543768-20234-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> <1389543768-20234-4-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: dborkman@redhat.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:54162 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750918AbaAOBQf (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:16:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1389543768-20234-4-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 17:22:48 +0100 > +static int packet_read_pending(const struct packet_ring_buffer *rb) > +{ > + int i, refcnt = 0; > + > + /* We don't use pending refcount in rx_ring. */ > + if (rb->pending_refcnt == NULL) > + return 0; > + > + for_each_possible_cpu(i) > + refcnt += *per_cpu_ptr(rb->pending_refcnt, i); > + > + return refcnt; > +} David Laight stated that this works properly only if all the arithmetic is unsigned. Therefore, maybe use "unsigned int" for refcnt here? Can you respin this series with that fixed? Thanks.