From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Willy Tarreau Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] mvneta driver performance improvements Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:48:31 +0100 Message-ID: <20140115074831.GD4605@1wt.eu> References: <1389525848-1814-1-git-send-email-w@1wt.eu> <20140114.170026.713728312597031838.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]:55399 "EHLO 1wt.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750799AbaAOHse (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2014 02:48:34 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140114.170026.713728312597031838.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 05:00:26PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Willy Tarreau > Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:24:02 +0100 > > > this patch series implements several performance improvements on the > > mvneta driver. > > Ignore that last email, I meant to say that this series did not apply > cleanly to net-next, sorry for the confusion. David, this is because the first series is not applied first. I can understand it was not very clear (just mentionned in the e-mail's body). Do you prefer me to send you the two series for net-next or is it better to wait for the first series to be merged first before applying the second one ? Just tell me what you prefer and I'll adapt. Thanks, Willy