* [RFC net] tcp: metrics: Avoid duplicate entries with the same destination-IP
@ 2014-01-13 15:25 Christoph Paasch
2014-01-13 16:47 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Paasch @ 2014-01-13 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: David Miller, Eric Dumazet
Note: This patch is based on "net" and so the source-IP is not yet part
of the tcp-metrics.
Because the tcp-metrics is an RCU-list, it may be that two
soft-interrupts are inside __tcp_get_metrics() for the same
destination-IP at the same time. If this destination-IP is not yet part of
the tcp-metrics, both soft-interrupts will end up in tcpm_new and create
a new entry for this IP.
So, we will have two tcp-metrics with the same destination-IP in the list.
This patch now takes the tcp_metrics_lock before calling
__tcp_get_metrics().
I post this as an RFC, because this patch will make the TCP-stack take
the tcp_metrics_lock even if the metric is already in the cache.
I tested it with apache-benchmark on a short file with
ab -c 100 -n 100000 server/1KB
IMO this should stress the code most, but there was no significant
performance regression.
Another solution might be to leave tcp_get_metrics() as it is, and in
tcpm_new do another call to __tcp_get_metrics() while holding the
spin-lock. We would then check __tcp_get_metrics twice for new entries
but we won't hold the spin-lock needlessly anymore.
So, it's a tradeoff between taking the tcp_metrics_lock more often vs.
calling __tcp_get_metrics twice for new entries.
Suggestions are very welcome.
Fixes: 51c5d0c4b169b (tcp: Maintain dynamic metrics in local cache.)
Signed-off-by: Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@uclouvain.be>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_metrics.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_metrics.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_metrics.c
index 06493736fbc8..7748a5d9f37a 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_metrics.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_metrics.c
@@ -138,7 +138,6 @@ static struct tcp_metrics_block *tcpm_new(struct dst_entry *dst,
struct tcp_metrics_block *tm;
struct net *net;
- spin_lock_bh(&tcp_metrics_lock);
net = dev_net(dst->dev);
if (unlikely(reclaim)) {
struct tcp_metrics_block *oldest;
@@ -153,7 +152,7 @@ static struct tcp_metrics_block *tcpm_new(struct dst_entry *dst,
} else {
tm = kmalloc(sizeof(*tm), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!tm)
- goto out_unlock;
+ return NULL;
}
tm->tcpm_addr = *addr;
@@ -164,8 +163,6 @@ static struct tcp_metrics_block *tcpm_new(struct dst_entry *dst,
rcu_assign_pointer(net->ipv4.tcp_metrics_hash[hash].chain, tm);
}
-out_unlock:
- spin_unlock_bh(&tcp_metrics_lock);
return tm;
}
@@ -303,6 +300,8 @@ static struct tcp_metrics_block *tcp_get_metrics(struct sock *sk,
net = dev_net(dst->dev);
hash = hash_32(hash, net->ipv4.tcp_metrics_hash_log);
+ spin_lock_bh(&tcp_metrics_lock);
+
tm = __tcp_get_metrics(&addr, net, hash);
reclaim = false;
if (tm == TCP_METRICS_RECLAIM_PTR) {
@@ -314,6 +313,8 @@ static struct tcp_metrics_block *tcp_get_metrics(struct sock *sk,
else
tcpm_check_stamp(tm, dst);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&tcp_metrics_lock);
+
return tm;
}
--
1.8.3.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC net] tcp: metrics: Avoid duplicate entries with the same destination-IP
2014-01-13 15:25 [RFC net] tcp: metrics: Avoid duplicate entries with the same destination-IP Christoph Paasch
@ 2014-01-13 16:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-01-15 20:18 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2014-01-13 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Paasch; +Cc: netdev, David Miller
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 16:25 +0100, Christoph Paasch wrote:
> Another solution might be to leave tcp_get_metrics() as it is, and in
> tcpm_new do another call to __tcp_get_metrics() while holding the
> spin-lock. We would then check __tcp_get_metrics twice for new entries
> but we won't hold the spin-lock needlessly anymore.
This is the only solution if you want to fix this.
Cost of lookup are the cache line misses.
Avoiding the spinlock is a must.
The second 'lookup' is basically free, as the first one have populated
cpu caches.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC net] tcp: metrics: Avoid duplicate entries with the same destination-IP
2014-01-13 16:47 ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2014-01-15 20:18 ` David Miller
2014-01-15 23:21 ` Christoph Paasch
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2014-01-15 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: eric.dumazet; +Cc: christoph.paasch, netdev
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 08:47:49 -0800
> On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 16:25 +0100, Christoph Paasch wrote:
>
>> Another solution might be to leave tcp_get_metrics() as it is, and in
>> tcpm_new do another call to __tcp_get_metrics() while holding the
>> spin-lock. We would then check __tcp_get_metrics twice for new entries
>> but we won't hold the spin-lock needlessly anymore.
>
> This is the only solution if you want to fix this.
> Cost of lookup are the cache line misses.
> Avoiding the spinlock is a must.
>
> The second 'lookup' is basically free, as the first one have populated
> cpu caches.
Indeed, taking the lock in tcp_get_metrics() is to be avoided at all
costs.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC net] tcp: metrics: Avoid duplicate entries with the same destination-IP
2014-01-15 20:18 ` David Miller
@ 2014-01-15 23:21 ` Christoph Paasch
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Paasch @ 2014-01-15 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller; +Cc: eric.dumazet, netdev
On 15/01/14 - 12:18:56, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 08:47:49 -0800
>
> > On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 16:25 +0100, Christoph Paasch wrote:
> >
> >> Another solution might be to leave tcp_get_metrics() as it is, and in
> >> tcpm_new do another call to __tcp_get_metrics() while holding the
> >> spin-lock. We would then check __tcp_get_metrics twice for new entries
> >> but we won't hold the spin-lock needlessly anymore.
> >
> > This is the only solution if you want to fix this.
> > Cost of lookup are the cache line misses.
> > Avoiding the spinlock is a must.
> >
> > The second 'lookup' is basically free, as the first one have populated
> > cpu caches.
>
> Indeed, taking the lock in tcp_get_metrics() is to be avoided at all
> costs.
Yes, I will send the updated patch tomorrow. Didn't yet had the time to send
it.
Christoph
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-01-15 23:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-01-13 15:25 [RFC net] tcp: metrics: Avoid duplicate entries with the same destination-IP Christoph Paasch
2014-01-13 16:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-01-15 20:18 ` David Miller
2014-01-15 23:21 ` Christoph Paasch
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).