From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] bpf: do not use reciprocal divide Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 18:56:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20140117.185600.1405505573912550580.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1389797407.31367.340.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <20140115.170230.640619926492650356.davem@davemloft.net> <20140117085916.GA4208@osiris> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, hannes@stressinduktion.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dborkman@redhat.com, darkjames-ws@darkjames.pl, mgherzan@gmail.com, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, matt@ozlabs.org To: heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:41706 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752100AbaARC4B (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:56:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20140117085916.GA4208@osiris> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Heiko Carstens Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:59:16 +0100 > Could you please also apply the patch below to your tree? It would only > generate a merge conflict, that would need fixing, if it would sit in the > s390 tree. Applied and I queued it up for -stable so I can combine it with Eric's original change when I submit it to -stable.