From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] bpf: do not use reciprocal divide Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 11:12:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20140118101230.GA3462@osiris> References: <1389797407.31367.340.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <20140115.170230.640619926492650356.davem@davemloft.net> <20140117085916.GA4208@osiris> <20140117.185600.1405505573912550580.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, hannes@stressinduktion.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dborkman@redhat.com, darkjames-ws@darkjames.pl, mgherzan@gmail.com, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, matt@ozlabs.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.110]:60260 "EHLO e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752363AbaARKMi (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jan 2014 05:12:38 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:12:36 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B511B08061 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:11:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.250]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s0IACKDV64880728 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:12:20 GMT Received: from d06av09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s0IACVHS003704 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 03:12:32 -0700 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140117.185600.1405505573912550580.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 06:56:00PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Heiko Carstens > Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:59:16 +0100 > > > Could you please also apply the patch below to your tree? It would only > > generate a merge conflict, that would need fixing, if it would sit in the > > s390 tree. > > Applied and I queued it up for -stable so I can combine it with > Eric's original change when I submit it to -stable. Great, thank you!