From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: fw@strlen.de
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] net: ip, ipv6: handle gso skbs in forwarding path
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:57:46 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140127.125746.15766634214020447.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1390845492-18780-1-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de>
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:58:12 +0100
> Marcelo Ricardo Leitner reported problems when the forwarding link
> path has a lower mtu than the incoming link if the inbound interface
> supports GRO.
>
> Given:
> Host <mtu1500> R1 <mtu1200> R2
>
> Host sends tcp stream which is routed via R1 and R2. R1 performs GRO.
>
> In this case, the kernel will fail to send ICMP fragmentation needed
> messages (or pkt too big for ipv6), as gso packets currently bypass the
> dst mtu checks in forward path. Instead, Linux tries to send out packets
> exceeding R1-R2 link mtu.
>
> When locking route MTU on Host (i.e., no ipv4 DF bit set), R1 does
> not fragment the packets when forwarding, and again tries to send out
> packets exceeding R1-R2 link mtu.
>
> This alters the forwarding dstmtu checks to take the individual gso
> segment lengths into account.
>
> For ipv6, we send out pkt too big error for gso if the individual
> segments are too big.
>
> For ipv4, we either send icmp fragmentation needed, or, if the DF bit
> is not set, perform software segmentation and let the output path
> create fragments when the packet is leaving the machine.
> It is not 100% correct as the error message will contain the headers of
> the GRO skb instead of the original/segmented one, but it seems to
> work fine in my (limited) tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Applied, thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-27 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-27 17:58 [PATCH V4] net: ip, ipv6: handle gso skbs in forwarding path Florian Westphal
2014-01-27 20:57 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140127.125746.15766634214020447.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox