From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Qin Chuanyu <qinchuanyu@huawei.com>
Cc: jasowang@redhat.com, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 8% performance improved by change tap interact with kernel stack
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:34:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140128083459.GB16833@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52E766D4.4070901@huawei.com>
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 04:14:12PM +0800, Qin Chuanyu wrote:
> according perf test result,I found that there are 5%-8% cpu cost on
> softirq by use netif_rx_ni called in tun_get_user.
>
> so I changed the function which cause skb transmitted more quickly.
> from
> tun_get_user ->
> netif_rx_ni(skb);
> to
> tun_get_user ->
> rcu_read_lock_bh();
> netif_receive_skb(skb);
> rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
> The test result is as below:
> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz
> NIC: intel 82599
> Host OS/Guest OS:suse11sp3
> Qemu-1.6
> netperf udp 512(VM tx)
> test model: VM->host->host
>
> modified before : 2.00Gbps 461146pps
> modified after : 2.16Gbps 498782pps
>
> 8% performance gained from this change,
> Is there any problem for this patch ?
I think it's okay - IIUC this way we are processing xmit directly
instead of going through softirq.
Was meaning to try this - I'm glad you are looking into this.
Could you please check latency results?
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-28 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-28 8:14 8% performance improved by change tap interact with kernel stack Qin Chuanyu
2014-01-28 8:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2014-01-28 9:14 ` Qin Chuanyu
2014-01-28 9:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-28 10:19 ` Qin Chuanyu
2014-01-28 10:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-28 16:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-01-28 17:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-29 7:41 ` Qin Chuanyu
2014-01-29 7:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-28 16:56 ` Rick Jones
2014-01-28 14:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-01-29 7:12 ` Qin Chuanyu
2014-02-11 13:21 ` Qin Chuanyu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140128083459.GB16833@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qinchuanyu@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).