From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net: wireless: move regulatory timeout work to power efficient workqueue Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 04:35:31 -0500 Message-ID: <20140131093531.GA25559@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <1391123310-6425-1-git-send-email-zoran.markovic@linaro.org> <1391160084.4141.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Zoran Markovic , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Shaibal Dutta , "John W. Linville" , "David S. Miller" To: Johannes Berg Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1391160084.4141.1.camel-8Nb76shvtaUJvtFkdXX2HixXY32XiHfO@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hello, On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:21:24AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > I'm not sure if this is part of a larger patchset actually adding that > "system_power_efficient_wq", but maybe it'd be better to expose a > function as an API rather than the wq struct? > > Something like > > scheduled_delayed_work_pwr_efficient(...)? While there are some benefits to using dedicated functions for specific workqueues, I don't think it brings enough benefits to justify adding dedicated API and am unlikely to add new ones. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html