From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Gortmaker Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tree-wide: clean up no longer required #include Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 09:28:25 -0500 Message-ID: <20140205142824.GA23780@windriver.com> References: <1391547118-21967-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20140205060633.GE30094@gmail.com> <20140205172723.3fa841793b3fa3f3f534937f@canb.auug.org.au> <20140205064150.GA31568@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell , linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140205064150.GA31568@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org [Re: [GIT PULL] tree-wide: clean up no longer required #include ] On 05/02/2014 (Wed 07:41) Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Ingo, > > > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:06:33 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > So, if you meant Linus to pull it, you probably want to cite a real > > > Git URI along the lines of: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/init.git > > > > Paul provided the proper git url further down in the mail along with the > > usual pull request message (I guess he should have put that bit at the > > top). > > Yeah, indeed, and it even comes with a signed tag, which is an extra > nice touch: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/linux.git tags/init-cleanup > > (I guess the https was mentioned first to lower expectations.) Just to clarify, the init.git was the repo of raw commits+series file that was used for testing on linux next; now useless, except for showing the last several weeks of history (hence the visual http link). The signed tag [separate repo] is the application of those commits against the 3.14-rc1 tag, which was the end goal from the beginning. Does history matter? In the case of a cleanup like this, it does only in the immediate context of this pull request; to help distinguish this work from some short lived half baked idea that also had its testing invalidated by arbitrarily rebasing onto the latest shiny tag. I wouldn't have even mentioned the patch repo, except for the fact that I know how Linus loves arbitrary rebases [and malformed pull requests] :) Thanks, Paul. -- > > Thanks, > > Ingo