From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Cochran Subject: Re: [PATCH] dp83640: Support a configurable number of periodic outputs Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 06:48:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20140207054852.GA4954@netboy> References: <1391503942-694-1-git-send-email-stefan.sorensen@spectralink.com> <20140204092939.GA9862@netboy> <1391511238.3003.25.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> <1391527464.7871.15.camel@e37108.spectralink.com> <20140204154323.GA2815@netboy> <1391586016.7871.23.camel@e37108.spectralink.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "ben@decadent.org.uk" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: =?iso-8859-1?B?U/hyZW5zZW4s?= Stefan Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f51.google.com ([74.125.83.51]:47665 "EHLO mail-ee0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751464AbaBGFtH (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Feb 2014 00:49:07 -0500 Received: by mail-ee0-f51.google.com with SMTP id b57so1297489eek.10 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 21:49:06 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1391586016.7871.23.camel@e37108.spectralink.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 07:40:17AM +0000, S=F8rensen, Stefan wrote: >=20 > Will all PTP clocks be associated with an ethernet device? If not, > wouldn't a PTP ioctl be better than ethtool?=20 Hm, maybe. I don't have a strong preference. I'll try and put together an idea of how the ioctl might look like. Thanks, Richard