From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
To: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 01/12] bonding: remove bond->lock from bond_arp_rcv
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 08:10:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140218071029.GB14534@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <530306C2.1050003@huawei.com>
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:07:46PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>On 2014/2/18 14:12, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:02:41PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>>> On 2014/2/17 22:41, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
...snip...
>>> I think it is not enough, you should add rcu_dereference for bond->curr_active_slave, it may be changed during
>>> the recv processing.
>>
>> bond->lock has absolutely nothing to du with bond->curr_active_slave .
>>
>Yep, this problem is introduced by commit aeea64ac7， there is no way to protect the curr_active_slave, so
>I think you could fix it in this patch together.
>
> else if (bond->curr_active_slave &&
> time_after(slave_last_rx(bond, bond->curr_active_slave),
> bond->curr_active_slave->jiffies))
It's not related to this patchset, but yeah, I'll send a fix afterwards.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Ding
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-18 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-17 14:41 [PATCH v4 net-next 0/12] bonding: add an option to rely on unvalidated arp packets Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-17 14:41 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 01/12] bonding: remove bond->lock from bond_arp_rcv Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-18 4:02 ` Ding Tianhong
2014-02-18 6:12 ` Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-18 7:07 ` Ding Tianhong
2014-02-18 7:10 ` Veaceslav Falico [this message]
2014-02-17 14:41 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 02/12] bonding: permit using arp_validate with non-ab modes Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-17 15:22 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2014-02-18 6:39 ` Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-17 14:41 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 03/12] bonding: always update last_arp_rx on packet recieve Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-17 14:41 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 04/12] bonding: always set recv_probe to bond_arp_rcv in arp monitor Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-17 14:41 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 05/12] bonding: extend arp_validate to be able to receive unvalidated arp-only traffic Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-17 14:41 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 06/12] bonding: document the new _arp options for arp_validate Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-17 14:41 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 07/12] bonding: use the new options to correctly set last_arp_rx Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-17 14:41 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 08/12] bonding: use last_arp_rx in slave_last_rx() Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-17 14:41 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 09/12] bonding: use last_arp_rx in bond_loadbalance_arp_mon() Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-17 14:41 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 10/12] bonding: remove useless updating of slave->dev->last_rx Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-17 14:41 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 11/12] bonding: trivial: rename slave->jiffies to ->last_link_up Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-17 15:02 ` David Laight
2014-02-17 15:15 ` Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-17 14:41 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 12/12] bonding: rename last_arp_rx to last_rx Veaceslav Falico
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140218071029.GB14534@redhat.com \
--to=vfalico@redhat.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).