From: Flavio Leitner <fbl@redhat.com>
To: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Deliver skbs to intermediate interfaces, when using cascaded rx-handlers
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:10:35 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140221171034.GA2488@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140221100158.GA19594@gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:01:58AM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
> I have a system with the following configuration:
>
> * eth0 is a regular Ethernet MAC, connected to a hardware switch.
> * port[1-4] are the in-kernel representation of the switch.
> * team0 is a regular team-interface which bonds port1 and port2.
>
> +-------+
> | team0 |
> +---+---+
> |
> +----+----+
> | |
> +---+---+ +---+---+ +-------+ +-------+
> | port1 | | port2 | | port3 | | port4 |
> +---+---+ +---+---+ +---+---+ +---+---+
> | | | |
> +---------+----+----+---------+
> |
> +---+---+
> | eth0 |
> +-------+
>
> Both the switch and the team driver attaches rx-handlers to their
> lower layers. The problem is that team expects LACP frames that
> are intercepted by team0, to also be delivered to the port interface
> by __netif_receive_skb_core (in the final iteration of the registered
> protocols). However in this case, when two rx-handlers are cascaded,
> the skb will be delivered to eth0, since that is the original device
> (orig_dev).
Indeed. It is not possible to update orig_dev, so it is stuck
on eth0 regardless of all the stacked interfaces.
> There are a few ways this can be solved as far as i can see:
>
> 1. Introduce a new rx-handler return code that specifies that
> skb->dev has been altered, like RX_HANDLER_ANOTHER, and that we
> also want to change orig_dev to this new device.
But then you need to know which rx-handler will run next, because
the orig_dev might still be implicit wanted.
> 2. Change the switch driver to return RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED and then
> queue the skb all over again, though I am afraid that this will eat
> some cycles.
Before queue again, you need to update skb->dev, right? This seems
similar to (1).
> 3. Keep track of all traversed interfaces and change the final
> protocol iteration to deliver the skb to all intermediate devices.
That's what I thought too.
fbl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-21 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-21 10:01 Deliver skbs to intermediate interfaces, when using cascaded rx-handlers Tobias Waldekranz
2014-02-21 10:26 ` Jiri Pirko
2014-02-21 11:12 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2014-02-21 11:37 ` Jiri Pirko
2014-02-21 12:02 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2014-02-21 13:05 ` Jiri Pirko
2014-02-21 14:31 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2014-02-21 14:48 ` Jiri Pirko
2014-02-21 14:54 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2014-02-21 17:23 ` David Miller
2014-02-24 7:28 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2014-02-21 17:10 ` Flavio Leitner [this message]
2014-02-24 7:22 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2014-02-26 18:18 ` Flavio Leitner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140221171034.GA2488@localhost.localdomain \
--to=fbl@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tobias@waldekranz.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).