From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Gordeev Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 28/35] qlcnic: Use pci_enable_msix_range() instead of pci_enable_msix() Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 10:24:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20140222092425.GA27897@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> References: <1393029870.15717.71.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> <1393030127.15717.72.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Himanshu Madhani , Rajesh Borundia , Shahed Shaikh , linux-driver@qlogic.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org To: Ben Hutchings Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1393030127.15717.72.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 12:48:47AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Sorry, I'm confused and this does work. But I wonder whether it is > really an improvement over using the old API. Slightly, as far as I am concerned - we just exchange tri-state oddity to re-enable MSI-X oddity. We're not going to improve drivers that can not work with any number of MSI-Xs from a range, like this one. > Ben. -- Regards, Alexander Gordeev agordeev@redhat.com