From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fix for a race condition in the inet frag code
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 18:13:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140303181340.25d38bd4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <531494F4.4030909@redhat.com>
On Mon, 03 Mar 2014 15:43:00 +0100
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 03/03/2014 03:40 PM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> wrote:
[...]
> >> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
> >> index bb075fc9a14f..322dcebfc588 100644
> >> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
> >> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
> >> @@ -278,9 +278,10 @@ static struct inet_frag_queue *inet_frag_intern(struct netns_frags *nf,
> >>
> >> atomic_inc(&qp->refcnt);
> >> hlist_add_head(&qp->list, &hb->chain);
> >> + inet_frag_lru_add(nf, qp);
> >> spin_unlock(&hb->chain_lock);
> >> read_unlock(&f->lock);
> >
[...]
> >
> inet_frag_kill when called from the IPv4/6 frag_queue function will remove the
> timer refcount, then inet_frag_put afterwards will drop it to 0 and free it and
> all of this could happen before the frag was ever added to the LRU list, then it
> gets added. This happens much easier for IPv6 because of the dropping of
> overlapping fragments in its frag_queue function, the point is we need to have
> the timer's refcount removed in any way (it could be the timer itself - there's
> an inet_frag_put in the end, or much easier by the frag_queue function).
> I think I've explained it badly, I hope this makes it clearer :-)
I like this desc better.
After some IRC discussions with Nik and Florian, I acknowledge this is
real race condition.
The real solution is the remove the LRU list system (which will also
solve a scalability problem), but short-term we need Nik's fix, which I
guess should be a stable fix.
Thanks Nik!
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-03 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-03 14:05 [PATCH] net: fix for a race condition in the inet frag code Nikolay Aleksandrov
2014-03-03 14:40 ` Florian Westphal
2014-03-03 14:43 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2014-03-03 17:13 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2014-03-03 14:49 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2014-03-03 15:31 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-03-03 15:34 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2014-03-03 17:17 ` Florian Westphal
2014-03-03 21:34 ` David Miller
2014-03-03 22:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2014-03-03 22:21 ` Florian Westphal
2014-03-04 7:28 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-03-06 1:34 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140303181340.25d38bd4@redhat.com \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).