From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 1/3] Extended BPF interpreter and converter Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 14:28:24 +0000 Message-ID: <20140304142824.GA1083@localhost.localdomain> References: <1393910304-4004-1-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> <1393910304-4004-2-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Daniel Borkmann , "David S. Miller" , Ingo Molnar , Will Drewry , Steven Rostedt , Peter Zijlstra , "H. Peter Anvin" , Jesse Gross , Thomas Gleixner , Masami Hiramatsu , Tom Zanussi , Jovi Zhangwei , Eric Dumazet , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Frederic Weisbecker , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Pekka Enberg , Arjan van de Ven , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Alexei Starovoitov Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1393910304-4004-2-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org If all issues raised by Daniel are addresed: Acked-by: Hagen Paul Pfeifer But ... >Future work: > >0. seccomp > >1. add extended BPF JIT for x86_64 > >2. add inband old/new demux and extended BPF verifier, so that new programs > can be loaded through old sk_attach_filter() and sk_unattached_filter_create() > interfaces > >3. tracing filters systemtap-like with extended BPF > >4. OVS with extended BPF > >5. nftables with extended BPF ... this is shit (not your fault). (Jitted) BPF envolved into a direction which is just not the right way to do it. You try to fix things, bypass architectural shortcomings of BPF, perf issues because and so on. The right direction is to write a new general purpose in-kernel interpreter from scratch. Capability layers should provide an compatible API for BPF and seccomp. You have the knowledge to do exactly this, you nearly already did this - you should start this undertake! -- Hagen Paul Pfeifer