netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] net: unix socket code abuses csum_partial
@ 2014-03-04 10:01 Anton Blanchard
  2014-03-04 18:41 ` David Miller
  2014-03-05  3:29 ` Anton Blanchard
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Anton Blanchard @ 2014-03-04 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: davem, edumazet, gustavold; +Cc: netdev


The unix socket code is using the result of csum_partial to
hash into a lookup table:

	unix_hash_fold(csum_partial(sunaddr, len, 0));

csum_partial is only guaranteed to produce something that can be
folded into a checksum, as its prototype explains:

 * returns a 32-bit number suitable for feeding into itself
 * or csum_tcpudp_magic

The 32bit value should not be used directly.

Depending on the alignment the ppc64 csum_partial will return
different 32bit values that will fold into the same checksum.

This difference causes the following testcase (courtesy of
Gustavo) to sometimes fail:


#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <stdio.h>

int main()
{
	int fd = socket(PF_LOCAL, SOCK_STREAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0);

	int i = 1;
	setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &i, 4);

	struct sockaddr addr;
	addr.sa_family = AF_LOCAL;
	bind(fd, &addr, 2);

	listen(fd, 128);

	struct sockaddr_storage ss;
	socklen_t sslen = (socklen_t)sizeof(ss);
	getsockname(fd, (struct sockaddr*)&ss, &sslen);

	fd = socket(PF_LOCAL, SOCK_STREAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0);

	if (connect(fd, (struct sockaddr*)&ss, sslen) == -1){
		perror(NULL);
		return 1;
	}
	printf("OK\n");
	return 0;
}


Use jhash instead of the current hand crafted csum_partial +
xor based hash.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---

Would appreciate a sanity check here. Are there other users that
expect a stable 32bit value out of csum_partial?

Is this performance critical enough that jhash is going to hurt?
Another option would be to csum_fold the 32bit intermediate value
and just hash based on the result.

Index: b/net/unix/af_unix.c
===================================================================
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -117,6 +117,7 @@
 #include <net/checksum.h>
 #include <linux/security.h>
 #include <linux/freezer.h>
+#include <linux/jhash.h>
 
 struct hlist_head unix_socket_table[2 * UNIX_HASH_SIZE];
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unix_socket_table);
@@ -161,13 +162,9 @@ static inline void unix_set_secdata(stru
  *    each socket state is protected by separate spin lock.
  */
 
-static inline unsigned int unix_hash_fold(__wsum n)
+static inline unsigned int unix_hash(void *data, unsigned int len)
 {
-	unsigned int hash = (__force unsigned int)n;
-
-	hash ^= hash>>16;
-	hash ^= hash>>8;
-	return hash&(UNIX_HASH_SIZE-1);
+	return jhash(data, len, 0) & (UNIX_HASH_SIZE - 1);
 }
 
 #define unix_peer(sk) (unix_sk(sk)->peer)
@@ -232,7 +229,7 @@ static int unix_mkname(struct sockaddr_u
 		return len;
 	}
 
-	*hashp = unix_hash_fold(csum_partial(sunaddr, len, 0));
+	*hashp = unix_hash(sunaddr, len);
 	return len;
 }
 
@@ -738,7 +735,7 @@ static int unix_autobind(struct socket *
 
 retry:
 	addr->len = sprintf(addr->name->sun_path+1, "%05x", ordernum) + 1 + sizeof(short);
-	addr->hash = unix_hash_fold(csum_partial(addr->name, addr->len, 0));
+	addr->hash = unix_hash(addr->name, addr->len);
 
 	spin_lock(&unix_table_lock);
 	ordernum = (ordernum+1)&0xFFFFF;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net: unix socket code abuses csum_partial
  2014-03-04 10:01 [PATCH] net: unix socket code abuses csum_partial Anton Blanchard
@ 2014-03-04 18:41 ` David Miller
  2014-03-04 18:50   ` Eric Dumazet
  2014-03-05  3:28   ` Anton Blanchard
  2014-03-05  3:29 ` Anton Blanchard
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2014-03-04 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: anton; +Cc: edumazet, gustavold, netdev

From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 21:01:04 +1100

> The unix socket code is using the result of csum_partial to
> hash into a lookup table:
> 
> 	unix_hash_fold(csum_partial(sunaddr, len, 0));
> 
> csum_partial is only guaranteed to produce something that can be
> folded into a checksum, as its prototype explains:
> 
>  * returns a 32-bit number suitable for feeding into itself
>  * or csum_tcpudp_magic
> 
> The 32bit value should not be used directly.
> 
> Depending on the alignment the ppc64 csum_partial will return
> different 32bit values that will fold into the same checksum.
> 
> This difference causes the following testcase (courtesy of
> Gustavo) to sometimes fail:

Alternatively you could just make unix_hash_fold() use csum_fold(),
right?

static inline unsigned int unix_hash_fold(__wsum n)
{
	unsigned int hash = (__force unsigned int) csum_fold(n);

	hash ^= hash>>8;
	return hash&(UNIX_HASH_SIZE-1);
}

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net: unix socket code abuses csum_partial
  2014-03-04 18:41 ` David Miller
@ 2014-03-04 18:50   ` Eric Dumazet
  2014-03-04 21:23     ` David Miller
  2014-03-05  3:28   ` Anton Blanchard
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2014-03-04 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller; +Cc: anton, edumazet, gustavold, netdev

On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 13:41 -0500, David Miller wrote:

> Alternatively you could just make unix_hash_fold() use csum_fold(),
> right?
> 
> static inline unsigned int unix_hash_fold(__wsum n)
> {
> 	unsigned int hash = (__force unsigned int) csum_fold(n);
> 
> 	hash ^= hash>>8;
> 	return hash&(UNIX_HASH_SIZE-1);
> }

Or simply use full_name_hash()

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net: unix socket code abuses csum_partial
  2014-03-04 18:50   ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2014-03-04 21:23     ` David Miller
  2014-03-04 21:55       ` Eric Dumazet
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2014-03-04 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: eric.dumazet; +Cc: anton, edumazet, gustavold, netdev

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 10:50:53 -0800

> On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 13:41 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> 
>> Alternatively you could just make unix_hash_fold() use csum_fold(),
>> right?
>> 
>> static inline unsigned int unix_hash_fold(__wsum n)
>> {
>> 	unsigned int hash = (__force unsigned int) csum_fold(n);
>> 
>> 	hash ^= hash>>8;
>> 	return hash&(UNIX_HASH_SIZE-1);
>> }
> 
> Or simply use full_name_hash()

I would prefer not, because this would be a performance regression
on platforms other than x86 and ARM, because only they implement
the optimized load_unaligned_zeropad().

Other architectures would end up with a byte-by-byte hash computation.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net: unix socket code abuses csum_partial
  2014-03-04 21:23     ` David Miller
@ 2014-03-04 21:55       ` Eric Dumazet
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2014-03-04 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller; +Cc: anton, edumazet, gustavold, netdev

On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 16:23 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>

> > Or simply use full_name_hash()
> 
> I would prefer not, because this would be a performance regression
> on platforms other than x86 and ARM, because only they implement
> the optimized load_unaligned_zeropad().
> 
> Other architectures would end up with a byte-by-byte hash computation.

Oh right, I missed this was fast only on x86 and ARM.

Sound like a project for arches maintainers then ;)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net: unix socket code abuses csum_partial
  2014-03-04 18:41 ` David Miller
  2014-03-04 18:50   ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2014-03-05  3:28   ` Anton Blanchard
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Anton Blanchard @ 2014-03-05  3:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller; +Cc: edumazet, gustavold, netdev


Hi Dave,

> Alternatively you could just make unix_hash_fold() use csum_fold(),
> right?
> 
> static inline unsigned int unix_hash_fold(__wsum n)
> {
> 	unsigned int hash = (__force unsigned int) csum_fold(n);
> 
> 	hash ^= hash>>8;
> 	return hash&(UNIX_HASH_SIZE-1);
> }

Thanks, sounds good. Updated patch on the way.

Anton

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] net: unix socket code abuses csum_partial
  2014-03-04 10:01 [PATCH] net: unix socket code abuses csum_partial Anton Blanchard
  2014-03-04 18:41 ` David Miller
@ 2014-03-05  3:29 ` Anton Blanchard
  2014-03-06 21:19   ` David Miller
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Anton Blanchard @ 2014-03-05  3:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: davem, edumazet, gustavold; +Cc: netdev


The unix socket code is using the result of csum_partial to
hash into a lookup table:

	unix_hash_fold(csum_partial(sunaddr, len, 0));

csum_partial is only guaranteed to produce something that can be
folded into a checksum, as its prototype explains:

 * returns a 32-bit number suitable for feeding into itself
 * or csum_tcpudp_magic

The 32bit value should not be used directly.

Depending on the alignment, the ppc64 csum_partial will return
different 32bit partial checksums that will fold into the same
16bit checksum.

This difference causes the following testcase (courtesy of
Gustavo) to sometimes fail:


#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <stdio.h>

int main()
{
	int fd = socket(PF_LOCAL, SOCK_STREAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0);

	int i = 1;
	setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &i, 4);

	struct sockaddr addr;
	addr.sa_family = AF_LOCAL;
	bind(fd, &addr, 2);

	listen(fd, 128);

	struct sockaddr_storage ss;
	socklen_t sslen = (socklen_t)sizeof(ss);
	getsockname(fd, (struct sockaddr*)&ss, &sslen);

	fd = socket(PF_LOCAL, SOCK_STREAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0);

	if (connect(fd, (struct sockaddr*)&ss, sslen) == -1){
		perror(NULL);
		return 1;
	}
	printf("OK\n");
	return 0;
}
 

As suggested by davem, fix this by using csum_fold to fold the
partial 32bit checksum into a 16bit checksum before using it.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---

Index: b/net/unix/af_unix.c
===================================================================
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -163,9 +163,8 @@ static inline void unix_set_secdata(stru
 
 static inline unsigned int unix_hash_fold(__wsum n)
 {
-	unsigned int hash = (__force unsigned int)n;
+	unsigned int hash = (__force unsigned int)csum_fold(n);
 
-	hash ^= hash>>16;
 	hash ^= hash>>8;
 	return hash&(UNIX_HASH_SIZE-1);
 }

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net: unix socket code abuses csum_partial
  2014-03-05  3:29 ` Anton Blanchard
@ 2014-03-06 21:19   ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2014-03-06 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: anton; +Cc: edumazet, gustavold, netdev

From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:29:58 +1100

> Index: b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
> +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> @@ -163,9 +163,8 @@ static inline void unix_set_secdata(stru
>  
>  static inline unsigned int unix_hash_fold(__wsum n)
>  {
> -	unsigned int hash = (__force unsigned int)n;
> +	unsigned int hash = (__force unsigned int)csum_fold(n);
>  
> -	hash ^= hash>>16;
>  	hash ^= hash>>8;
>  	return hash&(UNIX_HASH_SIZE-1);

Looks great, I'll apply this, thanks Anton!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-03-06 21:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-03-04 10:01 [PATCH] net: unix socket code abuses csum_partial Anton Blanchard
2014-03-04 18:41 ` David Miller
2014-03-04 18:50   ` Eric Dumazet
2014-03-04 21:23     ` David Miller
2014-03-04 21:55       ` Eric Dumazet
2014-03-05  3:28   ` Anton Blanchard
2014-03-05  3:29 ` Anton Blanchard
2014-03-06 21:19   ` David Miller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).