From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: net and drivers/net: Warn on missing blank line after variable declaration Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 15:35:30 -0800 Message-ID: <20140306153530.bd61c160ba6f7872d6967b2e@linux-foundation.org> References: <1394104358-23438-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> <1394104390-23477-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> <20140306.142919.763823800315842610.davem@davemloft.net> <1394148520.16156.8.camel@joe-AO722> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , kys@microsoft.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org, apw@canonical.com To: Joe Perches Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1394148520.16156.8.camel@joe-AO722> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 15:28:40 -0800 Joe Perches wrote: > Networking prefers this style, so warn when it's not used. > > Networking uses: > > void foo(int bar) > { > int baz; > > code... > } > > not > > void foo(int bar) > { > int baz; > code... > } > > There are a limited number of false positives when using > macros to declare variables like: > > WARNING: networking uses a blank line after declarations > #330: FILE: net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c:330: > + int dif = sk->sk_bound_dev_if; > + INET_ADDR_COOKIE(acookie, saddr, daddr) um wait wut wot. *All* kernel code uses blank line between end-of-locals and start-of-code. Or if it doesn't it should, thwap. Why are we special-casing net/?