From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hariprasad S Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 00/31] Misc. fixes for cxgb4 and iw_cxgb4 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 11:47:03 +0530 Message-ID: <20140307061700.GD23862@hariprasad-pc> References: <1393936917-25847-1-git-send-email-hariprasad@chelsio.com> <20140304.132226.75524344104026791.davem@davemloft.net> <20140305053024.GA23862@hariprasad-pc> <008a01cf38ce$c883e820$598bb860$@opengridcomputing.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: "'David Miller'" , , , , , , , , To: Steve Wise Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <008a01cf38ce$c883e820$598bb860$@opengridcomputing.com> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 17:58:19 -0600, Steve Wise wrote: > > > BTW, if you're frustrated from having to send these patches so many > > > times because of changes being requested, this is the main reason > > > why you shouldn't queue up such enormous numbers of patches at one > > > time. > > > > > > Please try to keep your future submissions sizes more reasonable, > > > perhaps ~10 patches or so at most. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Sure, thanks for the suggestion. > > I will just re-post the revert patch on cxgb4 now, part of this > series, which is > > causing regression. > > And, I will split the rest of patch-series into 8-10 patches and > re-submit. > > I think you should keep this series as-is since folks have been > reviewing it as such. > Then going forward, we need to submit smaller sets more frequently... > > Steve. > > OK.. -Hari -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html