From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next,v4] hyperv: Add support for virtual Receive Side Scaling (vRSS) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:32:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20140321.153237.2236797908349183626.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20140321.144957.550032279989990583.davem@davemloft.net> <20140321.145501.2003616654661701935.davem@davemloft.net> <84837c9e73f24bcd8f652a24f616ff1e@DFM-DB3MBX15-06.exchange.corp.microsoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: olaf@aepfle.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jasowang@redhat.com, driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: haiyangz@microsoft.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <84837c9e73f24bcd8f652a24f616ff1e@DFM-DB3MBX15-06.exchange.corp.microsoft.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org Sender: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Haiyang Zhang Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:12:43 +0000 > Could it be merged into net-next tree? You submitted a patch against net-next, that means you are implicitly stating that all dependencies are in place in _that_ tree and that you tested it in _that_ tree. If the situation is otherwise you must explicitly state this in your patch submission.