netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Monam Agarwal <monamagarwal123@gmail.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, jasowang@redhat.com, xemul@parallels.com,
	wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, therbert@google.com, yamato@redhat.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/net: Use RCU_INIT_POINTER(x, NULL) in tun.c
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 23:33:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140323213349.GA8832@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395604457.9117.21.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>

On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:54:17PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-03-23 at 21:41 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> 
> > The rcu_assign_pointer() ensures that the initialization of a structure       
> > is carried out before storing a pointer to that structure. 
> > In the case of the NULL pointer, there is no structure to initialize,
> > so we can safely drop smp_wmb in this case.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > Lightly tested.
> > v is evaluated twice here but that should be ok since this
> > only happens when v is a constant, so evaluating it should
> > have no side effects.
> > Paul, what do you think?
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > index 72bf3a0..d33c9ec 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > @@ -587,7 +587,8 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void)
> >   */
> >  #define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) \
> >  	do { \
> > -		smp_wmb(); \
> > +		if (!__builtin_constant_p(v) || (v)) \
> > +			smp_wmb(); \
> >  		ACCESS_ONCE(p) = RCU_INITIALIZER(v); \
> >  	} while (0)
> >  
> 
> Yeah, I suggest you read d322f45ceed525daa changelog ;)
> 

Oh I see. It does not seem hard to silence that warning though.
See below.
Alternatively apply these patches everywhere though it does
look like too much work for too little gain to me.

-->

rcu: optimize rcu_assign_pointer with NULL

The rcu_assign_pointer() dropped __builtin_constant_p check to
avoid a compiler warning, but we can actually work around it without
adding code.

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

---

Untested, too late here, sorry.

 
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 72bf3a0..9111d40 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -585,9 +585,14 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void)
  * please be careful when making changes to rcu_assign_pointer() and the
  * other macros that it invokes.
  */
+/* The convoluted __builtin_constant_p logic is here to prevent
+ * gcc from emitting a warning when passed a pointer to a variable.
+ */
 #define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) \
 	do { \
-		smp_wmb(); \
+		if (!__builtin_constant_p(v) || \
+		    (__builtin_constant_p(v) ? (v) : NULL)) \
+			smp_wmb(); \
 		ACCESS_ONCE(p) = RCU_INITIALIZER(v); \
 	} while (0)
 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-23 21:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-23 18:32 [PATCH] drivers/net: Use RCU_INIT_POINTER(x, NULL) in tun.c Monam Agarwal
2014-03-23 19:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-03-23 19:54   ` Eric Dumazet
2014-03-23 21:33     ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2014-03-23 22:12       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-03-24  5:09         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-03-24  5:25           ` Eric Dumazet
2014-03-24  6:22             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-03-24  8:57               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-03-24 12:53               ` Eric Dumazet
2014-03-24  8:47             ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-03-24 13:38               ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-03-26  1:19 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140323213349.GA8832@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=monamagarwal123@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    --cc=wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    --cc=yamato@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).