From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] vlan: Mask off vlan acceleration features on vlan device. Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 21:15:05 +0000 Message-ID: <20140326211504.GA21393@macbook.localnet> References: <1395865521-2318-1-git-send-email-vyasevic@redhat.com> <1395865711-3347-1-git-send-email-vyasevic@redhat.com> <20140326.171038.2150319831233512825.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: vyasevic@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:38003 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755425AbaCZVPN (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Mar 2014 17:15:13 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140326.171038.2150319831233512825.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 05:10:38PM -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Vlad Yasevich > Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:28:31 -0400 > > > Some drivers incorrectly assign vlan acceleration features to > > vlan_features thus causing issues for Q-in-Q vlan configurations. > > Prevent this once and for all by masking off acceleration features > > for vlan devices until such time as we support stacked acceleration. > > > > Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich > > So what if we do have chips that can offload Q-in-Q? Will we use > a new flag? For 802.1ad that was the intention, using the NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_* flags.