From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC v2 0/6] introduce infrastructure for support of switch chip datapath Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:03:10 -0400 Message-ID: <20140327140309.GD31168@tuxdriver.com> References: <1395851472-10524-1-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> <53334A3F.6020105@mojatatu.com> <20140327072107.GC2845@minipsycho.orion> <5333FD12.9060404@mojatatu.com> <20140327110223.GA1615@casper.infradead.org> <533408C0.8000608@mojatatu.com> <20140327120012.GA13573@casper.infradead.org> <53341A63.3000004@mojatatu.com> <20140327125711.GL2845@minipsycho.orion> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: john.r.fastabend-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, edumazet-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, andy-QlMahl40kYEqcZcGjlUOXw@public.gmane.org, dev-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org, f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, ogerlitz-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, ben-/+tVBieCtBitmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org, roopa-qUQiAmfTcIp+XZJcv9eMoEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org, Jamal Hadi Salim , vyasevic-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, nhorman-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org, sfeldma-qUQiAmfTcIp+XZJcv9eMoEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, stephen-OTpzqLSitTUnbdJkjeBofR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org, dborkman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org To: Jiri Pirko Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140327125711.GL2845-RDzucLLXGGI88b5SBfVpbw@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 01:57:11PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 01:32:35PM CET, jhs-jkUAjuhPggJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org wrote: > >On 03/27/14 08:00, Thomas Graf wrote: > > > >>It seems like we reached pretty good consensus on the model. What > >>remaining issues do you see with the port model proposed in v2? > >> > > > >Are we really following the same thread? > >I dont see any rallying behind Jiri's approach from the > >other folks who have their own code and way of approaching things. > >I am hoping we dont continue with the split that is there > >already. > > It is not a split. It is just a completion of a model. Adding missing > parts. At least I see it that way. I probably wouldn't call it a 'split' either. But, I agree with Jamal that we are nowhere near consensus so far. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org might be all we have. Be ready.