From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: arno@natisbad.org (Arnaud Ebalard)
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION,BISECTED] mvneta broken in 3.14 on RN2120, RN102 and RN104 after e3a8786c10e7
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 18:31:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140412183112.7ca31cb6@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k3au8qba.fsf@natisbad.org>
Dear Arnaud Ebalard,
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 18:28:57 +0200, Arnaud Ebalard wrote:
> Network is broken w/ 3.14 kernel on Netgear ReadyNAS 102 (the SoC is
> an Armada 370 using mvneta driver and rgmii phy): nothing sent, nothing
> received from the interface. This came as a surprise (it was reported by
> two users) as 3.14-rc8 was ok on my side.
>
> I also checked on a ReadyNAS 104 (Armada 370 using mvneta driver and
> rgmii phy for both interfaces) and a ReadyNAS 2120 (Armada XP using
> mvneta driver and rgmii phy for both interfaces). They are both
> affected too.
>
> A short bisect session pointed e3a8786c10e7 (net: mvneta: fix usage as a
> module on RGMII configurations). Reverting it put things back in order
> on those three devices.
>
> I took a quick look at e3a8786c10e7 commit and did some tests to narrow
> the root cause (I do not have A370 functional specification doc at hand
> today so I was not able to check mvneta details):
>
> -}
> -
> /* Start the Ethernet port RX and TX activity */
> static void mvneta_port_up(struct mvneta_port *pp)
> {
> @@ -2756,12 +2728,15 @@ static void mvneta_port_power_up(struct mvneta_port *pp, int phy_mode)
> mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_UNIT_INTR_CAUSE, 0);
>
> if (phy_mode == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII)
> - mvneta_port_sgmii_config(pp);
> + mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_SERDES_CFG, MVNETA_SGMII_SERDES_PROTO);
> + else
> + mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_SERDES_CFG, MVNETA_RGMII_SERDES_PROTO);
>
>
> I built a first kernel with the 'else' branch above removed (rationale:
> SERDES config was not set for RGMII prior to the patch). The issue
> remained.
>
> - mvneta_gmac_rgmii_set(pp, 1);
> + val = mvreg_read(pp, MVNETA_GMAC_CTRL_2);
> +
> + val |= MVNETA_GMAC2_PCS_ENABLE | MVNETA_GMAC2_PORT_RGMII;
>
> I removed MVNETA_GMAC2_PCS_ENABLE flag setting (rationale: it was only
> done for SGMII prior to the patch and all my platforms have RGMII
> connected PHY). *The issue disappeared on all 3 NAS with that simple
> change*.
Yes, issue known. See https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73401.
Unfortunately, at this point I don't have enough informations to fix
both issues: the issue you're having, and the issue of using mvneta as
a module. Since the issue you're having is much more problematic, I'll
send a patch to revert my patch, until I have enough informations to
fix the problem in a proper way.
Thanks for your report!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-12 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-12 16:28 [REGRESSION,BISECTED] mvneta broken in 3.14 on RN2120, RN102 and RN104 after e3a8786c10e7 Arnaud Ebalard
2014-04-12 16:31 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2014-04-12 16:37 ` Arnaud Ebalard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140412183112.7ca31cb6@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=arno@natisbad.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).