From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
To: "Li, Zhen-Hua" <zhen-hual@hp.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
stephen hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
Jerry Chu <hkchu@google.com>,
Sathya Perla <sathya.perla@emulex.com>,
Subbu Seetharaman <subbu.seetharaman@emulex.com>,
Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@emulex.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: Add rtnl_lock for netif_device_attach/detach
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:38:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140416073803.GB19994@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397632082-18453-1-git-send-email-zhen-hual@hp.com>
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 03:08:02PM +0800, Li, Zhen-Hua wrote:
>From: "Li, Zhen-Hua" <zhen-hual@hp.com>
>
>As netif_running is called in netif_device_attach/detach. There should be
>rtnl_lock/unlock called, to avoid dev stat change during netif_device_attach
>and detach being called.
>I checked NIC some drivers, some of them have netif_device_attach/detach
>called between rtnl_lock/unlock, while some drivers do not.
It can race with any other thread that takes the lock - i.e. suppose you
have a driver that doesn't take the lock and calls netif_device_attach(),
while another thread (completely unrelated to the issue) holds rtnl_lock -
this way the trylock will return false, the thread that took rtnl releases
it - and you'll see the exact same behaviour as without your patch.
I'm not sure about the issue you're trying to fix here - there might be a
better approach which I'm not aware of, however with your approach you
should really either remove the rtnl locking from all drivers that use this
function (and insert a normal rtnl_lock here) or, vice-versa, add it to all
drivers and add an ASSERT_RTNL to netif_device_detach/attach.
>
>This patch is tring to find a generic way to fix this for all NIC drivers.
>
>Signed-off-by: Li, Zhen-Hua <zhen-hual@hp.com>
>---
> net/core/dev.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
>index 5b3042e..795bbc5 100644
>--- a/net/core/dev.c
>+++ b/net/core/dev.c
>@@ -2190,10 +2190,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__dev_kfree_skb_any);
> */
> void netif_device_detach(struct net_device *dev)
> {
>+ /**
>+ * As netif_running is called , rtnl_lock and unlock are needed to
>+ * avoid __LINK_STATE_START bit changes during this function call.
>+ */
>+ int need_unlock;
>+
>+ need_unlock = rtnl_trylock();
> if (test_and_clear_bit(__LINK_STATE_PRESENT, &dev->state) &&
> netif_running(dev)) {
> netif_tx_stop_all_queues(dev);
> }
>+ if (need_unlock)
>+ rtnl_unlock();
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_device_detach);
>
>@@ -2205,11 +2214,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_device_detach);
> */
> void netif_device_attach(struct net_device *dev)
> {
>+ /**
>+ * As netif_running is called , rtnl_lock and unlock are needed to
>+ * avoid __LINK_STATE_START bit changes during this function call.
>+ */
>+ int need_unlock;
>+
>+ need_unlock = rtnl_trylock();
> if (!test_and_set_bit(__LINK_STATE_PRESENT, &dev->state) &&
> netif_running(dev)) {
> netif_tx_wake_all_queues(dev);
> __netdev_watchdog_up(dev);
> }
>+ if (need_unlock)
>+ rtnl_unlock();
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_device_attach);
>
>--
>1.7.10.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-16 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-16 7:08 [PATCH 1/1] net: Add rtnl_lock for netif_device_attach/detach Li, Zhen-Hua
2014-04-16 7:38 ` Veaceslav Falico [this message]
2014-04-16 8:34 ` Li, ZhenHua
2014-04-18 19:01 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-04-21 6:30 ` Li, ZhenHua
2014-04-21 11:54 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-04-22 17:26 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140416073803.GB19994@redhat.com \
--to=vfalico@redhat.com \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@emulex.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkchu@google.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=sathya.perla@emulex.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=subbu.seetharaman@emulex.com \
--cc=zhen-hual@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).