From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
To: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ipv6_fib limit spinlock hold times for /proc/net/ipv6_route
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 16:20:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140424142030.GD1960@order.stressinduktion.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <535918BC.5030708@fb.com>
Hi!
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 09:59:24AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> The ipv6 code to dump routes in /proc/net/ipv6_route can hold
> a read lock on the table for a very long time. This ends up blocking
> writers and triggering softlockups.
>
> This patch is a simple work around to limit the number of entries
> we'll walk while processing /proc/net/ipv6_route. It intentionally
> slows down proc file reading to make sure we don't lock out the
> real ipv6 traffic.
I guess most time is spent in formatting and printing the rt6_info details
to the procfs file. Have you tried excluding !(rt6_info->rt6i_flags &
RTF_CACHE) routes?
Maybe this is a viable alternative. A patch could also check for
RTF_DYNAMIC and RTF_MODIFIED so we would still show redirected and
mtu-caching nodes.
> This patch is also horrible, and doesn't actually fix the entire
> problem. We still have rcu_read_lock held the whole time we cat
> /proc/net/ipv6_route. On an unpatched machine, I've clocked the
> time required to cat /proc/net/ipv6_route at 14 minutes.
>
> java cats this proc file on startup to search for local routes, and the
> resulting contention on the table lock makes our boxes fall over.
Urks, does plain openjdk do that or is this something in your application?
>
> So, I'm sending the partial fix to get discussion started.
I am planing to submit patches which reduce the caching of DST_HOST
entries in the ipv6 fib next month which will result in a much smaller
fib to walk by then.
Greetings,
Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-24 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-24 13:59 [PATCH RFC] ipv6_fib limit spinlock hold times for /proc/net/ipv6_route Chris Mason
2014-04-24 14:20 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa [this message]
2014-04-24 14:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-04-24 14:41 ` Chris Mason
2014-04-25 21:31 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-04-26 4:06 ` David Miller
2014-04-24 14:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-04-25 19:53 ` David Miller
2014-04-25 20:09 ` David Miller
2014-04-25 20:27 ` Chris Mason
2014-04-25 21:52 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-04-26 4:11 ` David Miller
2014-04-28 17:21 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140424142030.GD1960@order.stressinduktion.org \
--to=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).