From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] qlcnic: clarify hwmon Kconfig dependency Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 16:09:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20140502.160951.396568397404555176.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4879713.xMSSnUPZKf@wuerfel> <036FA1BC4A80D448AB7D9C3AAFBBCAF5B68382@AVMB1.qlogic.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: arnd@arndb.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, shahed.shaikh@qlogic.com, Dept-HSGLinuxNICDev@qlogic.com To: harish.patil@qlogic.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:37078 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753078AbaEBUJx (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2014 16:09:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <036FA1BC4A80D448AB7D9C3AAFBBCAF5B68382@AVMB1.qlogic.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Harish Patil Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:51:27 +0000 > Can we make it into an one line expression as done in few other cases: ... > bool "QLOGIC QLCNIC 82XX and 83XX family HWMON support" > - depends on QLCNIC && HWMON > + depends on QLCNIC && HWMON && !(QLCNIC=y && HWMON=m) Indeed this is much better and is consistent with what other driver Kconfig entries use. Can someone formally submit this without the email client patch corruption and proper signoffs? Thanks!