From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
To: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Cc: fubar@us.ibm.com, andy@greyhouse.net, davem@davemloft.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] bonding: remove the unnecessary struct bond_net
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 15:26:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140507132642.GP6295@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399434319-7300-2-git-send-email-dingtianhong@huawei.com>
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:45:17AM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>Move the structure bond_net forward, and remove the unnecessary structure declaration.
>
>Cc: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
>Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
>Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
>Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
>---
> drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h | 18 ++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>index b8bdd0a..9f23bf3 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>@@ -487,7 +487,14 @@ static inline bool slave_can_tx(struct slave *slave)
> return false;
> }
>
>-struct bond_net;
>+struct bond_net {
>+ struct net * net; /* Associated network namespace */
You might as well clean this up to look like "foo *bar;".
>+ struct list_head dev_list;
>+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
>+ struct proc_dir_entry * proc_dir;
Ditto.
>+#endif
>+ struct class_attribute class_attr_bonding_masters;
>+};
>
> int bond_arp_rcv(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave);
> void bond_dev_queue_xmit(struct bonding *bond, struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *slave_dev);
>@@ -516,15 +523,6 @@ struct net_device *bond_option_active_slave_get_rcu(struct bonding *bond);
> struct net_device *bond_option_active_slave_get(struct bonding *bond);
> const char *bond_slave_link_status(s8 link);
>
>-struct bond_net {
>- struct net * net; /* Associated network namespace */
>- struct list_head dev_list;
>-#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
>- struct proc_dir_entry * proc_dir;
>-#endif
>- struct class_attribute class_attr_bonding_masters;
>-};
>-
> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> void bond_create_proc_entry(struct bonding *bond);
> void bond_remove_proc_entry(struct bonding *bond);
>--
>1.8.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-07 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-07 3:45 [PATCH net-next 0/3] bonding: slight optimization and cleanup Ding Tianhong
2014-05-07 3:45 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] bonding: remove the unnecessary struct bond_net Ding Tianhong
2014-05-07 13:26 ` Veaceslav Falico [this message]
2014-05-07 13:50 ` Ding Tianhong
2014-05-07 3:45 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] bonding: simplify the slave_do_arp_validate_only() Ding Tianhong
2014-05-07 3:45 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] bonding: remove the unused macro Ding Tianhong
2014-05-07 13:27 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] bonding: slight optimization and cleanup Veaceslav Falico
2014-05-07 13:34 ` Veaceslav Falico
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140507132642.GP6295@redhat.com \
--to=vfalico@redhat.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).