From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Veaceslav Falico Subject: Re: bonding directly changes underlying device address Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 06:55:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20140515045524.GA27773@mikrodark.usersys.redhat.com> References: <5371FCD0.7050502@mellanox.com> <20140513115527.GC2910@minipsycho.orion> <20030.1399998641@localhost.localdomain> <20140514080114.GA30960@mikrodark.usersys.redhat.com> <5046.1400117925@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: Or Gerlitz , Jiri Pirko , Or Gerlitz , Eyal Perry , netdev , Noa Osherovich To: Jay Vosburgh Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f176.google.com ([74.125.82.176]:55298 "EHLO mail-we0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751278AbaEOEzr (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2014 00:55:47 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id q59so485411wes.7 for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 21:55:46 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5046.1400117925@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 06:38:45PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote: ...snip... > So, I'd say "No" to conversion to dev_set_mac_address() and >"show me the code" to the "stash it in the slave" plan. Ok, got it, I will try to move it to struct slave. Thank you! > > -J > >--- > -Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@canonical.com