From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] net: filter: x86: fix JIT address randomization Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 08:52:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20140515065227.GA10217@osiris> References: <1400018755-3049-1-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> <20140513.183145.1568789082256942703.davem@davemloft.net> <20140514080557.GB9848@osiris> <20140514.161038.604524051618558919.davem@redhat.com> <5373D4BF.1040002@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , ast@plumgrid.com, edumazet@google.com, dborkman@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com To: "H. Peter Anvin" Return-path: Received: from e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.112]:40339 "EHLO e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751257AbaEOGwc (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2014 02:52:32 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 15 May 2014 07:52:30 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86E0219005E for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 07:52:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.213]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s4F6qSRs196970 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 06:52:28 GMT Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s4F6qR3f024612 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 00:52:28 -0600 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5373D4BF.1040002@zytor.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 01:40:31PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 05/14/2014 01:10 PM, David Miller wrote: > > From: Heiko Carstens > > Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 10:05:57 +0200 > > > >> Dave, can you route this via -net? > > > > Pardon for being a bit confused, but it would seem x86 or net would be > the logical routes for this -- I don't mind at all it being routed > through net, but that would seem to be between myself (and the other x86 > maintainers) and Dave... Hi Peter, you missed the s390 version of Alexei's patch which I sent as reply to this thread. As usual I got a delivery failure for your zytor.com email address (added your Intel address this time). So the question was if Dave could add the s390 version of the patch to -net. Thanks, Heiko