netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH] net/mlx4_core: Preserve pci_dev_data after __mlx4_remove_one()
@ 2014-05-27 18:54 David Miller
  2014-05-28  1:48 ` Wei Yang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2014-05-27 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: weiyang; +Cc: netdev


If you want me to add this to -stable, you'll have to do the backporting
for me as this change doesn't come anywhere near to applying to v3.14.4

Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net/mlx4_core: Preserve pci_dev_data after __mlx4_remove_one()
  2014-05-27 18:54 [PATCH] net/mlx4_core: Preserve pci_dev_data after __mlx4_remove_one() David Miller
@ 2014-05-28  1:48 ` Wei Yang
  2014-05-28  2:37   ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2014-05-28  1:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller; +Cc: weiyang, netdev

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 02:54:03PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>
>If you want me to add this to -stable, you'll have to do the backporting
>for me as this change doesn't come anywhere near to applying to v3.14.4

David,

Yep, I am willing to do this.

I haven't done some backporting job before, so not sure how to and which
attention I should pay.

I guess I should use this tree:
     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jirislaby/linux-stable.git
and apply it on tag v3.14.4?

>
>Thanks.

-- 
Richard Yang
Help you, Help me

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net/mlx4_core: Preserve pci_dev_data after __mlx4_remove_one()
  2014-05-28  1:48 ` Wei Yang
@ 2014-05-28  2:37   ` David Miller
  2014-05-28  2:46     ` Wei Yang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2014-05-28  2:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: weiyang; +Cc: netdev

From: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 09:48:48 +0800

> I haven't done some backporting job before, so not sure how to and which
> attention I should pay.
> 
> I guess I should use this tree:
>      git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jirislaby/linux-stable.git
> and apply it on tag v3.14.4?

That is Jiri's personal tree strictly for 3.12 -stable development.

The real -stable tree is at:

	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git

And you should make versions for the most recent tags for 3.14, 3.10, 3.4,
and 3.2

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net/mlx4_core: Preserve pci_dev_data after __mlx4_remove_one()
  2014-05-28  2:37   ` David Miller
@ 2014-05-28  2:46     ` Wei Yang
  2014-05-28  3:18       ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2014-05-28  2:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller; +Cc: weiyang, netdev

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 07:37:37PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>From: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 09:48:48 +0800
>
>> I haven't done some backporting job before, so not sure how to and which
>> attention I should pay.
>> 
>> I guess I should use this tree:
>>      git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jirislaby/linux-stable.git
>> and apply it on tag v3.14.4?
>
>That is Jiri's personal tree strictly for 3.12 -stable development.
>
>The real -stable tree is at:
>
>	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
>
>And you should make versions for the most recent tags for 3.14, 3.10, 3.4,
>and 3.2

Ok, this may take some time to verify.

Could I backport it one version by one version? Or need to send out for these
four versions at the same time?

-- 
Richard Yang
Help you, Help me

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net/mlx4_core: Preserve pci_dev_data after __mlx4_remove_one()
  2014-05-28  2:46     ` Wei Yang
@ 2014-05-28  3:18       ` David Miller
  2014-05-28  3:26         ` Wei Yang
  2014-05-31  2:46         ` Wei Yang
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2014-05-28  3:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: weiyang; +Cc: netdev

From: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 10:46:50 +0800

> Could I backport it one version by one version? Or need to send out for these
> four versions at the same time?

It's awkward for me to submit a fix for only one release, I submit a
specific set of fixes to all relevant -stable branches at one time.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net/mlx4_core: Preserve pci_dev_data after __mlx4_remove_one()
  2014-05-28  3:18       ` David Miller
@ 2014-05-28  3:26         ` Wei Yang
  2014-05-31  2:46         ` Wei Yang
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2014-05-28  3:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller; +Cc: weiyang, netdev

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:18:03PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>From: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 10:46:50 +0800
>
>> Could I backport it one version by one version? Or need to send out for these
>> four versions at the same time?
>
>It's awkward for me to submit a fix for only one release, I submit a
>specific set of fixes to all relevant -stable branches at one time.

Ok, got it :-)

-- 
Richard Yang
Help you, Help me

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net/mlx4_core: Preserve pci_dev_data after __mlx4_remove_one()
  2014-05-28  3:18       ` David Miller
  2014-05-28  3:26         ` Wei Yang
@ 2014-05-31  2:46         ` Wei Yang
  2014-05-31  6:35           ` David Miller
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2014-05-31  2:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller; +Cc: weiyang, netdev

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:18:03PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>From: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 10:46:50 +0800
>
>> Could I backport it one version by one version? Or need to send out for these
>> four versions at the same time?
>
>It's awkward for me to submit a fix for only one release, I submit a
>specific set of fixes to all relevant -stable branches at one time.

David,

I have back port code to 3.14, 3.10 and verified.

While on 3.4, this kernel version doesn't work on our latest machine.
This is a latest Power Machine. I don't have a spare x86 machine to verify
this card. And this card is in US, while I am in China.

Is it possible to send out the code without verification? And ask help from
others, like Mellanox engineer? Otherwise this would be a little trouble.

-- 
Richard Yang
Help you, Help me

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net/mlx4_core: Preserve pci_dev_data after __mlx4_remove_one()
  2014-05-31  2:46         ` Wei Yang
@ 2014-05-31  6:35           ` David Miller
  2014-06-01  2:41             ` Wei Yang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2014-05-31  6:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: weiyang; +Cc: netdev

From: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 10:46:54 +0800

> I have back port code to 3.14, 3.10 and verified.
> 
> While on 3.4, this kernel version doesn't work on our latest machine.
> This is a latest Power Machine. I don't have a spare x86 machine to verify
> this card. And this card is in US, while I am in China.
> 
> Is it possible to send out the code without verification? And ask help from
> others, like Mellanox engineer? Otherwise this would be a little trouble.

Just do a best effort backport and make sure it compiles cleanly.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net/mlx4_core: Preserve pci_dev_data after __mlx4_remove_one()
  2014-05-31  6:35           ` David Miller
@ 2014-06-01  2:41             ` Wei Yang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2014-06-01  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller; +Cc: weiyang, netdev

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:35:49PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>From: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 10:46:54 +0800
>
>> I have back port code to 3.14, 3.10 and verified.
>> 
>> While on 3.4, this kernel version doesn't work on our latest machine.
>> This is a latest Power Machine. I don't have a spare x86 machine to verify
>> this card. And this card is in US, while I am in China.
>> 
>> Is it possible to send out the code without verification? And ask help from
>> others, like Mellanox engineer? Otherwise this would be a little trouble.
>
>Just do a best effort backport and make sure it compiles cleanly.

Got it, I will make sure it compiles on our platform.


-- 
Richard Yang
Help you, Help me

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-01  2:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-05-27 18:54 [PATCH] net/mlx4_core: Preserve pci_dev_data after __mlx4_remove_one() David Miller
2014-05-28  1:48 ` Wei Yang
2014-05-28  2:37   ` David Miller
2014-05-28  2:46     ` Wei Yang
2014-05-28  3:18       ` David Miller
2014-05-28  3:26         ` Wei Yang
2014-05-31  2:46         ` Wei Yang
2014-05-31  6:35           ` David Miller
2014-06-01  2:41             ` Wei Yang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).