From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wei Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/mlx4_core: Preserve pci_dev_data after __mlx4_remove_one() Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 10:41:29 +0800 Message-ID: <20140601024129.GA5674@richard> References: <20140528024650.GA8602@richard> <20140527.231803.1411461924645076157.davem@davemloft.net> <20140531024654.GA12848@richard> <20140530.233549.1224347263965890953.davem@davemloft.net> Reply-To: Wei Yang Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from e23smtp09.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.142]:35024 "EHLO e23smtp09.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750793AbaFAClg (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 May 2014 22:41:36 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp09.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 12:41:34 +1000 Received: from d23relay04.au.ibm.com (d23relay04.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.120]) by d23dlp03.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB55B3578048 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 12:41:32 +1000 (EST) Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.138]) by d23relay04.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s512JqDu53149798 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 12:19:53 +1000 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s512fVOI025476 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 12:41:31 +1000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140530.233549.1224347263965890953.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:35:49PM -0700, David Miller wrote: >From: Wei Yang >Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 10:46:54 +0800 > >> I have back port code to 3.14, 3.10 and verified. >> >> While on 3.4, this kernel version doesn't work on our latest machine. >> This is a latest Power Machine. I don't have a spare x86 machine to verify >> this card. And this card is in US, while I am in China. >> >> Is it possible to send out the code without verification? And ask help from >> others, like Mellanox engineer? Otherwise this would be a little trouble. > >Just do a best effort backport and make sure it compiles cleanly. Got it, I will make sure it compiles on our platform. -- Richard Yang Help you, Help me