From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [patch net-next 3/5] ipv6: consider net.ipv6.conf.all sysctls when making decisions Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:13:34 -0700 Message-ID: <20140610101334.565bc484@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> References: <1402417153-2551-1-git-send-email-milos.vyletel@gmail.com> <1402417153-2551-4-git-send-email-milos.vyletel@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, amwang@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Oliver Neukum , Alexey Kuznetsov , James Morris , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , Patrick McHardy , Pravin B Shelar , Nicolas Dichtel , Mike Rapoport , Daniel Borkmann , Or Gerlitz , Tom Herbert , Hannes Frederic Sowa , Florent Fourcot , Eric Dumazet , Paul Durrant , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org (open list:USB CDC ETHERNET...), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) To: Milos Vyletel Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1402417153-2551-4-git-send-email-milos.vyletel@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:19:11 -0400 Milos Vyletel wrote: > As it is right now net.ipv6.conf.all.* are mostly ignored and instead > we're only making decisions based on interface specific settings. These > settings are coppied from net.ipv6.conf.default and changing either all > or default settings have no effect. Although this is the right idea conceptually, it risks creating unhappy users because it changes the semantics of the API. This will probably break somebody's configuration.