From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] rtnetlink: fix userspace API breakage for iproute2
 < v3.9.0
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20140612.104353.925636381476010213.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20140530.174248.715408523447246496.davem@davemloft.net>
	<538DBDB3.7030505@redhat.com>
	<5399B575.7070604@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	stephen@networkplumber.org, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com,
	michael.riesch@omicron.at
To: mschmidt@redhat.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:53197 "EHLO
	shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750773AbaFLRnz (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 12 Jun 2014 13:43:55 -0400
In-Reply-To: <5399B575.7070604@redhat.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 16:13:09 +0200

> I am sorry for harping on this, but could you please either reconsider
> the NAK, or explain what considerations are more important than
> userspace compatibility in this case?

I'm still thinking about this, please be patient.