From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wei Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.14-stable] net/mlx4_core: Preserve pci_dev_data after __mlx4_remove_one() Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:08:49 +0800 Message-ID: <20140617030849.GA12893@richard> References: <1401607475-8367-1-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140617024951.GB7886@richard> <20140616.200348.1292584099498677236.davem@davemloft.net> Reply-To: Wei Yang Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, amirv@mellanox.com, jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il, ogerlitz@mellanox.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from e23smtp05.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.147]:47478 "EHLO e23smtp05.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754046AbaFQDJE (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2014 23:09:04 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp05.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:08:56 +1000 Received: from d23relay04.au.ibm.com (d23relay04.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.120]) by d23dlp03.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570E93578048 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:08:52 +1000 (EST) Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (d23av01.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.96]) by d23relay04.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s5H2qd3a29556832 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:52:40 +1000 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s5H38odB005823 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:08:51 +1000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140616.200348.1292584099498677236.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 08:03:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote: >From: Wei Yang >Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:49:51 +0800 > >> I saw the fix for the crash during reboot is merged in mainline, while I am >> not sure how to check these backport is merged in the stable tree(not familiar >> to check it in stable tree.) >> >> Do you suggest me to include that fix and send these backport again? Or? > >I haven't gotten around to working with your backports, it's in my queue. Oh, got it :-) If any issue, please let me know. -- Richard Yang Help you, Help me