netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	zoltan.kiss@citrix.com,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Subject: [net-next PATCH V2 2/3] pktgen: avoid expensive set_current_state() call in loop
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:16:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140626111632.23576.46982.stgit@dragon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140626111549.23576.90201.stgit@dragon>

Avoid calling set_current_state() inside the busy-loop in
pktgen_thread_worker().  In case of pkt_dev->delay, then it is still
used/enabled in pktgen_xmit() via the spin() call.

The set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE) uses a xchg, which implicit
is LOCK prefixed.  I've measured the asm LOCK operation to take approx
8ns on this E5-2630 CPU.  Performance increase corrolate with this
measurement.

Performance data with CLONE_SKB==100000, rx-usecs=30:
 (single CPU performance, ixgbe 10Gbit/s, E5-2630)
 * Prev:  5454050 pps --> 183.35ns (1/5454050*10^9)
 * Now:   5684009 pps --> 175.93ns (1/5684009*10^9)
 * Diff:  +229959 pps -->  -7.42ns

Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
---

 net/core/pktgen.c |    9 +++------
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/pktgen.c b/net/core/pktgen.c
index fc17a9d..b61f553 100644
--- a/net/core/pktgen.c
+++ b/net/core/pktgen.c
@@ -3407,10 +3407,10 @@ static int pktgen_thread_worker(void *arg)
 
 	pr_debug("starting pktgen/%d:  pid=%d\n", cpu, task_pid_nr(current));
 
-	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-
 	set_freezable();
 
+	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+
 	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
 		pkt_dev = next_to_run(t);
 
@@ -3424,8 +3424,6 @@ static int pktgen_thread_worker(void *arg)
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
-
 		if (likely(pkt_dev)) {
 			pktgen_xmit(pkt_dev);
 
@@ -3456,9 +3454,8 @@ static int pktgen_thread_worker(void *arg)
 		}
 
 		try_to_freeze();
-
-		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 	}
+	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 
 	pr_debug("%s stopping all device\n", t->tsk->comm);
 	pktgen_stop(t);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-06-26 11:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-14 14:17 [net-next PATCH 0/5] Optimizing "pktgen" for single CPU performance Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-05-14 14:17 ` [net-next PATCH 1/5] ixgbe: trivial fixes while reading code Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-05-14 14:17 ` [net-next PATCH 2/5] ixgbe: increase default TX ring buffer to 1024 Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-05-14 14:28   ` David Laight
2014-05-14 19:25     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-05-14 16:28   ` Alexander Duyck
2014-05-14 17:49     ` David Miller
2014-05-14 19:09       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-05-14 19:54         ` David Miller
2014-05-15  9:16         ` David Laight
2014-05-29 15:29         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-05-14 14:17 ` [net-next PATCH 3/5] pktgen: avoid atomic_inc per packet in xmit loop Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-05-14 14:35   ` Eric Dumazet
2014-05-14 15:13     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-05-14 15:35       ` Eric Dumazet
2014-05-14 14:17 ` [net-next PATCH 4/5] pktgen: avoid expensive set_current_state() call in loop Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-05-14 14:18 ` [net-next PATCH 5/5] pktgen: RCU'ify "if_list" to remove lock in next_to_run() Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-06-26 11:16 ` [net-next PATCH V2 0/3] Optimizing pktgen for single CPU performance Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-06-26 11:16   ` [net-next PATCH V2 1/3] pktgen: document tuning for max NIC performance Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-06-26 11:16   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2014-06-26 11:16   ` [net-next PATCH V2 3/3] pktgen: RCU-ify "if_list" to remove lock in next_to_run() Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-07-01 22:51   ` [net-next PATCH V2 0/3] Optimizing pktgen for single CPU performance David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140626111632.23576.46982.stgit@dragon \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    --cc=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).