From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: Is: automated testing before David M picks them up? Was: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net v2] xen-netback: bookkeep number of active queues in our own module Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 12:34:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20140627.123438.2145034024736949555.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20140622.172105.1949118384610767695.davem@davemloft.net> <20140623084032.GU20819@zion.uk.xensource.com> <20140623153151.GA3261@laptop.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, wei.liu2@citrix.com To: konrad.wilk@oracle.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:60322 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751264AbaF0Tej (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:34:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140623153151.GA3261@laptop.dumpdata.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:31:51 -0400 > Having said that - how do you handle such situation with sub-maintainers > wanting to do some testing before they are cleared to go your way? Who cares, the bug gets found eventually right? There is no value in my letting changes sit for more than a day or two that aren't being actively discussed and look fine to me.