From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use dev_port for the ID of a network device. Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 09:25:47 -0300 Message-ID: <20140701122547.GA1204@oc0268524204.ibm.com> References: <1404160596-25859-1-git-send-email-cascardo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87egy54lwb.fsf@nemi.mork.no> <87a98t4jcm.fsf@nemi.mork.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn?= Mork Return-path: Received: from e24smtp02.br.ibm.com ([32.104.18.86]:39424 "EHLO e24smtp02.br.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752920AbaGAMZ5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2014 08:25:57 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e24smtp02.br.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 09:25:55 -0300 Received: from d24relay01.br.ibm.com (d24relay01.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.16]) by d24dlp01.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8900352006A for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 08:25:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d24av05.br.ibm.com (d24av05.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.44]) by d24relay01.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s61CQ7m34284542 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 09:26:08 -0300 Received: from d24av05.br.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d24av05.br.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s61CPqgr027521 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 08:25:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a98t4jcm.fsf@nemi.mork.no> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 09:40:57AM +0200, Bj=F8rn Mork wrote: > FYI: I just got this back from systemd-devel-owner@lists.freedesktop.= org : >=20 > Please subscribe to this mailing list, all non-subscriber emails are > automatically rejected by the server. > =20 > If you actually don't want to receive the mails, stay subscribed but > just disable the delivery in the mailman web interface. You will sti= ll > be able to send messages that way. > =20 > We were unable to cope with the amount of SPAM, and the moderation > queue was not actually moderated by anybody, so rejection seemed mor= e > appropriate than no answer and no delivery to the list. > =20 > Thanks for understanding. >=20 >=20 > Please do not crosspost between netdev and closed mailing lists. It > splits the followup threads between those who are inside the closed > community and those who are not. >=20 > I've removed systemd-devel from the CC list of this email. >=20 > Thanks for understanding. >=20 >=20 > Bj=F8rn >=20 Not sure how, but my patch got through, and I don't recall being subscribed, so I thought it was a an open list. Anyway, it's something that I considered important to be considered by the two communities. Kay raises up the matter of still using dev_id. Since we had drivers that used that in the past, should we use it as a fallback for older kernels where dev_port is not there? Regards. Cascardo.