From: Flavio Leitner <fbl@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Subject: Re: RSS is not efficient when forwarding (ixgbe)
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 16:36:44 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140704193644.GB2343@t520.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140703224408.GA2343@t520.home>
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 07:44:08PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a simple router setup which forwards traffic from
> one ixgbe 82599ES to another ixgbe of the same model.
>
> kernel: 3.16.0-rc2-00262-ga921e2a
>
> p2p1: 192.168.155.1/24 is the gateway of the LAN
> p2p2: 192.168.156.1/24 is the gateway of the other LAN
>
> While the ARP is resolving, I can see the packets being spread
> among all the 8 queues (8 online CPUs) available and that is fine.
>
> However, as soon as the TCP traffic starts, all streams are
> merged to rx-queue-0 which overwhelms one single CPU, so the
> total throughput is about 4Gbits/sec.
>
> I can see the driver sending different skb->hash for each stream,
> so it can't be the NIC.
>
> Also, if I run a local http on the router, the skb->hash pattern
> doesn't change, but the workload is spread among all CPUs.
>
> debug output while reproducing all the streams on rx-queue-0:
> [...]
> [11685.885093] ixgbe_rx_skb:1713 skb(ffff880222a77200) hash: 0xC2AF4A27
> [11685.891454] ixgbe_rx_skb:1713 skb(ffff880222a77200) hash: 0x8C5B749D
> [11685.897820] ixgbe_rx_skb:1713 skb(ffff880222a77200) hash: 0xA33BA6D5
> [11690.845032] net_ratelimit: 3276406 callbacks suppressed
> [...]
The command 'ehtool -S p2p1 | grep rx_queue' shows only rx queue #0
receiving packets. Also, /proc/interrupts shows only p2p1-TxRx-0
generating interrupts.
Nothing changes when I start irqbalance in the middle of the test.
However, if I create new streams, they are correctly distributed
among the NIC queues/irqs/CPUs.
I have tried the same setup and test with another card (bnx2, 1GbE)
and all queues got traffic by default though they were all assigned
to CPU#0 (no irqbalance), so this is expected and makes me think
this is specific to the ixgbe driver.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
fbl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-04 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-03 22:44 RSS is not efficient when forwarding Flavio Leitner
2014-07-04 19:36 ` Flavio Leitner [this message]
2014-07-05 16:09 ` RSS is not efficient when forwarding (ixgbe) Tom Herbert
2014-07-07 10:55 ` Flavio Leitner
2014-07-07 16:33 ` Skidmore, Donald C
2014-07-08 0:28 ` Flavio Leitner
2014-07-08 17:09 ` Carlos Carvalho
2014-07-08 17:21 ` Flavio Leitner
2014-07-08 17:32 ` Carlos Carvalho
2014-07-09 5:22 ` Flavio Leitner
2014-07-10 0:08 ` Carlos Carvalho
2014-07-10 1:14 ` Flavio Leitner
2014-07-11 0:11 ` Carlos Carvalho
2014-07-11 14:11 ` Skidmore, Donald C
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140704193644.GB2343@t520.home \
--to=fbl@redhat.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).