Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: stephen@networkplumber.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 79811] New: ethernet/dec/tulip/tulip_core.c:592: array index check in wrong place ?
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 17:01:08 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140710.170108.1244008191479717465.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140710055022.652ce61d@samsung-9>

From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 05:50:22 -0700

> Subject: [Bug 79811] New: ethernet/dec/tulip/tulip_core.c:592: array index check in wrong place ?
 ...
> ethernet/dec/tulip/tulip_core.c:592]: (style) Array index 'j' is used before
> limits check.
> 
>             for (j = 0; buf[j] != 0xee && j < 1600; j++)
> 
> Suggest put limit check before index use.

This code has never actually ever been compiled for at least a decade
or two, it's ifdef protected against "way_too_many_messages" which
nothing will ever define.

This is what really eats me about automated tools sometimes, and in this case
I have two gripes:

1) The tool doesn't take into consideration that the code might never
   be compiled.

2) The code actually is buggy is far more important ways, it takes a DMA mapping
   cookie and dereferences it as a CPU pointer:

			u8 *buf = (u8 *)(tp->rx_ring[i].buffer1);

   which is guaranteed to not work.

So in actuality this entire code block should be rewritten or removed.

      reply	other threads:[~2014-07-11  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-10 12:50 Fw: [Bug 79811] New: ethernet/dec/tulip/tulip_core.c:592: array index check in wrong place ? Stephen Hemminger
2014-07-11  0:01 ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140710.170108.1244008191479717465.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox