From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net: ppp: reset nextseq counter when
 enabling SC_MULTILINK
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20140716.142754.647038534547707816.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20140715.225259.1933230941203001162.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20140716231950.17744ie9e3i9ea9i@berry.schulz.ip-v6.eu>
	<20140716232443.872830586nfymtnf@berry.schulz.ip-v6.eu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org
To: develop@kristov.de
Return-path: <linux-ppp-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140716232443.872830586nfymtnf@berry.schulz.ip-v6.eu>
Sender: linux-ppp-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Christoph Schulz <develop@kristov.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 23:24:43 +0200

> Sorry, how should I do it? Based on the *current* state of net-next,
> i.e. based on my original (but incomplete) patch? Or based on the
> net-next tree before my original patch was included?

Based upon the current state of net-next, you're sending me a bug
fix for the change you made.