From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] tun: stop tx queue when limit is hit
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:31:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140721083106.GC21375@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140721065419.GB21375@breakpoint.cc>
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> > From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
> > Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 20:51:25 +0200
> >
> > > Currently tun just frees the skb and returns NETDEV_TX_OK
> > > when queue length exceeds txqlen.
> > >
> > > This causes severe packetloss and unneeded resource
> > > consumption on host when sending to vm connected via tun.
> > >
> > > Instead, lets stop the transmit queue and start it once
> > > packets are consumed from the queue. This allows the network
> > > stack to control applications that send data via tun device.
> >
> > I strongly suspect the current behavior is intentional, see
> > commit:
> >
> > commit 5d097109257c03a71845729f8db6b5770c4bbedc
> > Author: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > Date: Mon Dec 3 10:07:14 2012 +0000
> >
> > tun: only queue packets on device
>
> Looks like you're right :-/
>
> Alright, please ignore my patch.
>
> That being said, the current behaviour isn't ideal either.
>
> It took me quite some time to realize that packetloss
> was on the sender side inside tun driver and not on the receiver
> vm. Not stopping the queue was a bit ... unexpected.
Michael, do you think we could restore the 'stop queue' default
behaviour?
Looking at your changelog, the only concern seems to be the
'packets never consumed'/'receiver is stuck forever' case.
What about reverting 5d097109257c03a7184, and then adding some
type of tun watchdog that will zap the rcv queue + tx queue wakeup?
That should be quite noisy if we combine it with the WARN_ON
you usually get when (physical) NIC driver detect stalled tx unit.
What do you think?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-21 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-20 18:51 [PATCH -next] tun: stop tx queue when limit is hit Florian Westphal
2014-07-21 5:33 ` David Miller
2014-07-21 6:54 ` Florian Westphal
2014-07-21 8:31 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2014-07-21 8:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-07-21 9:19 ` Florian Westphal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140721083106.GC21375@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).