netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] tun: stop tx queue when limit is hit
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:31:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140721083106.GC21375@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140721065419.GB21375@breakpoint.cc>

Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> > From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
> > Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 20:51:25 +0200
> > 
> > > Currently tun just frees the skb and returns NETDEV_TX_OK
> > > when queue length exceeds txqlen.
> > > 
> > > This causes severe packetloss and unneeded resource
> > > consumption on host when sending to vm connected via tun.
> > > 
> > > Instead, lets stop the transmit queue and start it once
> > > packets are consumed from the queue.  This allows the network
> > > stack to control applications that send data via tun device.
> > 
> > I strongly suspect the current behavior is intentional, see
> > commit:
> > 
> > commit 5d097109257c03a71845729f8db6b5770c4bbedc
> > Author: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > Date:   Mon Dec 3 10:07:14 2012 +0000
> > 
> >     tun: only queue packets on device
> 
> Looks like you're right :-/
> 
> Alright, please ignore my patch.
> 
> That being said, the current behaviour isn't ideal either.
> 
> It took me quite some time to realize that packetloss
> was on the sender side inside tun driver and not on the receiver
> vm.  Not stopping the queue was a bit ... unexpected.

Michael, do you think we could restore the 'stop queue' default
behaviour?

Looking at your changelog, the only concern seems to be the
'packets never consumed'/'receiver is stuck forever' case.

What about reverting 5d097109257c03a7184, and then adding some
type of tun watchdog that will zap the rcv queue + tx queue wakeup?

That should be quite noisy if we combine it with the WARN_ON
you usually get when (physical) NIC driver detect stalled tx unit.

What do you think?

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-21  8:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-20 18:51 [PATCH -next] tun: stop tx queue when limit is hit Florian Westphal
2014-07-21  5:33 ` David Miller
2014-07-21  6:54   ` Florian Westphal
2014-07-21  8:31     ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2014-07-21  8:56       ` Eric Dumazet
2014-07-21  9:19         ` Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140721083106.GC21375@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).