netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: willemb@google.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, richardcochran@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/5] net-timestamp: additional sw tstamps and
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:43:30 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140731.134330.1615160836103431950.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406735328-7520-1-git-send-email-willemb@google.com>

From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:48:43 -0400

> Extend socket tx timestamping:
> - allow multiple types of software timestamps aside from send (1)
> - add software timestamp on tc enqueue (3)
> - add software timestamp for TCP (4)
> - add software timestamp for TCP on ACK (5)
> 
> The sk_flags option space is nearly exhausted. Also move the
> many timestamp options to a new sk->sk_tstamps (2).
> 
> The patchset extends Linux tx timestamping to monitoring of latency
> incurred within the kernel stack and to protocols embedded in TCP.
> Complex kernel setups may have multiple layers of queueing, including
> multiple instances of traffic shaping, and many classes per layer.
> Many applications embed discrete payloads into TCP bytestreams for
> reliability, flow control, etcetera. Detecting application tail
> latency in such scenarios relies on identifying the exact queue
> responsible if on the host, or the network latency if otherwise.

I'm mostly fine with this patchset, the only major blocker is the bit
that changes TCP segmenting behavior when timestamps are enabled.  I
really don't want to see us doing that, because that makes the
timestamps non-passive.

Please work towards a solution to that problem and also fixup the
minor naming et al. issues I brought up too.

Thanks.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-31 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-30 15:48 [PATCH net-next v4 0/5] net-timestamp: additional sw tstamps and Willem de Bruijn
2014-07-30 15:48 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/5] net-timestamp: extend SCM_TIMESTAMPING ancillary data struct Willem de Bruijn
2014-07-31 20:37   ` David Miller
2014-07-30 15:48 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/5] net-timestamp: move timestamp flags out of sk_flags Willem de Bruijn
2014-07-30 15:48 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/5] net-timestamp: ENQ timestamp on enqueue to traffic shaping layer Willem de Bruijn
2014-07-31 20:38   ` David Miller
2014-07-30 15:48 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/5] net-timestamp: TCP timestamping Willem de Bruijn
2014-07-31 20:41   ` David Miller
2014-07-30 15:48 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/5] net-timestamp: ACK timestamp for bytestreams Willem de Bruijn
2014-07-31 20:43 ` David Miller [this message]
2014-07-31 21:36   ` [PATCH net-next v4 0/5] net-timestamp: additional sw tstamps and Willem de Bruijn
2014-08-01  5:35     ` David Miller
2014-08-01 13:44       ` Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140731.134330.1615160836103431950.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).