From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Aring Subject: Re: Modular 6LoWPAN? (was: Re: 6lowpan: introduce new net/6lowpan directory) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 15:26:09 +0200 Message-ID: <20140807132606.GB17452@omega> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 02:37:38PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Alexander, > > On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Linux Kernel Mailing List > wrote: > > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/linus/;a=commit;h=2c6bed7cfcd3f594ed9e4d6919fa2ebea2243d19 > > Commit: 2c6bed7cfcd3f594ed9e4d6919fa2ebea2243d19 > > Parent: 6c53823ae0e10e723131055e1e65dd6a328a228e > > Refname: refs/heads/master > > Author: Alexander Aring > > AuthorDate: Fri Jul 11 10:24:18 2014 +0200 > > Committer: Marcel Holtmann > > CommitDate: Sat Jul 12 01:53:30 2014 +0200 > > > > 6lowpan: introduce new net/6lowpan directory > > > > This patch moves generic code which is used by bluetooth and ieee802154 > > 6lowpan to a new net/6lowpan directory. This directory contains generic > > 6LoWPAN code which is shared between bluetooth and ieee802154 MAC-Layer. > > > > This is the IPHC - "IPv6 Header Compression" format at the moment. Which > > is described by RFC 6282 [0]. The BLTE 6LoWPAN draft describes that the > > IPHC is the same format like IEEE 802.15.4, see [1]. > > > > Futuremore we can put more code into this directory which is shared > > between BLTE and IEEE 802.15.4 6LoWPAN like RFC 6775 or the routing > > protocol RPL RFC 6550. > > > > To avoid naming conflicts I renamed 6lowpan-y to ieee802154_6lowpan-y > > in net/ieee802154/Makefile. > > > > [0] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6282 > > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle-12#section-3.2 > > [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6775 > > [3] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6550 > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring > > Acked-by: Jukka Rissanen > > Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann > > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/net/6lowpan/Kconfig > > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ > > +config 6LOWPAN > > + bool "6LoWPAN Support" > > Is there any specific reason 6LOWPAN is bool instead of tristate? > IPV6 can be modular. > Indeed this can be modular. I see no special reason why it should not be tristate. Sorry, that I didn't see this. Can you please send patches to change it? Thanks. - Alex