netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: net_ns cleanup / RCU overhead
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 22:58:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140820055855.GB5579@hostway.ca> (raw)

Hello!

In trying to figure out what happened to a box running lots of vsftpd
since we deployed a CONFIG_NET_NS=y kernel to it, we found that the
(wall) time needed for cleanup_net() to complete, even on an idle box,
can be quite long:

#!/bin/bash

ip netns delete test >&/dev/null
while ip netns add test; do
        echo hi
        ip netns delete test
done

On my desktop and typical hosts, this prints at only around 4 or 6 per
second. While this is happening, "vmstat 1" reports 100% idle, and there
there are D-state processes with stacks similar to:

30566 [kworker/u16:1] D wait_rcu_gp+0x48, synchronize_sched+0x2f, cleanup_net+0xdb, process_one_work+0x175, worker_thread+0x119, kthread+0xbb, ret_from_fork+0x7c, 0xffffffffffffffff

32220 ip              D copy_net_ns+0x68, create_new_namespaces+0xfc, unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0x66, SyS_unshare+0x159, system_call_fastpath+0x16, 0xffffffffffffffff

copy_net_ns() is waiting on net_mutex which is held by cleanup_net().

vsftpd uses CLONE_NEWNET to set up privsep processes. There is a comment
about it being really slow before 2.6.35 (it avoids CLONE_NEWNET in that
case). I didn't find anything that makes 2.6.35 any faster, but on Debian
2.6.36-5-amd64, I notice it does seem to be a bit faster than 3.2, 3.10,
3.16, though still not anything I'd ever want to rely on per connection.

C implementation of the above: http://0x.ca/sim/ref/tools/netnsloop.c

Kernel stack "top": http://0x.ca/sim/ref/tools/pstack

What's going on here?

Simon-

             reply	other threads:[~2014-08-20  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-20  5:58 Simon Kirby [this message]
2014-08-28 19:24 ` net_ns cleanup / RCU overhead Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:44   ` Simon Kirby
2014-08-28 20:33     ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-08-28 20:46       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-29  0:40         ` Simon Kirby
2014-08-29  3:57           ` Julian Anastasov
2014-08-29 21:57             ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-08-29 23:52               ` Florian Westphal
2014-08-30  2:56                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-30  8:20               ` Julian Anastasov
2014-08-30  2:52           ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140820055855.GB5579@hostway.ca \
    --to=sim@hostway.ca \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).