From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.de>
To: Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>
Cc: Prashant Sreedharan <prashant@broadcom.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] tg3: Fix tx_pending checks for tg3_tso_bug
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 14:59:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140821215911.GA7117@f1.synalogic.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408614683.7644.19.camel@LTIRV-MCHAN1.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
On 2014/08/21 02:51, Michael Chan wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 18:23 -0700, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> > On 2014/08/19 16:10, Michael Chan wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 11:52 -0700, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> > > > @@ -7838,11 +7838,14 @@ static int tg3_tso_bug(struct tg3 *tp, struct tg3_napi *tnapi,
> > > > struct netdev_queue *txq, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > > > {
> > > > struct sk_buff *segs, *nskb;
> > > > - u32 frag_cnt_est = skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs * 3;
> > > >
> > > > - /* Estimate the number of fragments in the worst case */
> > > > - if (unlikely(tg3_tx_avail(tnapi) <= frag_cnt_est)) {
> > > > + if (unlikely(tg3_tx_avail(tnapi) <= skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs)) {
> > > > + trace_printk("stopping queue, %d <= %d\n",
> > > > + tg3_tx_avail(tnapi), skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs);
> > > > netif_tx_stop_queue(txq);
> > > > + trace_printk("stopped queue\n");
> > > > + tnapi->wakeup_thresh = skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs;
> > > > + BUG_ON(tnapi->wakeup_thresh >= tnapi->tx_pending);
> > > >
> > > > /* netif_tx_stop_queue() must be done before checking
> > > > * checking tx index in tg3_tx_avail() below, because in
> > >
> > > I don't quite understand this logic and I must be missing something.
> > > gso_segs is the number of TCP segments the large packet will be broken
> > > up into. If it exceeds dev->gso_max_segs, it means it exceeds
> > > hardware's capabilty and it will do GSO instead of TSO. But in this
> > > case in tg3_tso_bug(), we are doing GSO and we may not have enough DMA
> > > descriptors to do GSO. Each gso_seg typically requires 2 DMA
> > > descriptors.
> >
> > You're right, I had wrongly assumed that the skbs coming out of
> > skb_gso_segment() were linear. I'll address that in v2 of the patch by masking
> > out NETIF_F_SG in tg3_tso_bug().
> >
>
> While masking out NETF_F_SG will work, it will also disable checksum
> offload for the whole device momentarily.
>
> > I noticed another issue that had not occurred to me: when tg3_tso_bug is
> > submitting a full gso segs sequence to tg3_start_xmit, the code at the end of
> > that function stops the queue before the end of the sequence because tx_avail
> > becomes smaller than (MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1). The transmission actually proceeds
> > because tg3_tso_bug() does not honour the queue state but it seems rather
> > unsightly to me.
>
> That's why the number of DMA descriptors that we estimate has to be
> accurate. It's unfortunate that the various tg3 chips require so many
> different workarounds. The objective is to keep TSO and checksum
> enabled and workaround the occasional packets using GSO.
Ah, now I understand the reason for the * 3 in
u32 frag_cnt_est = skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs * 3;
/* Estimate the number of fragments in the worst case */
but that is not really the "worst case". It's not forbidden to have more than
two frags per skb output from skb_gso_segment(). I've kept this estimation
approach but I've added code to validate the estimation or else linearize the
skb.
>
> I believe that the boundary error conditions that you brought up can be
> addressed by enforcing some limits on the tx ring size and by reducing
> gso_max_size/gso_max_segs when necessary (for example when MTU and/or
> ring size is set very small).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-21 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-19 18:52 [PATCH 1/3] tg3: Limit minimum tx queue wakeup threshold Benjamin Poirier
2014-08-19 18:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] tg3: Fix tx_pending checks for tg3_tso_bug Benjamin Poirier
2014-08-19 20:56 ` Benjamin Poirier
2014-08-19 23:10 ` Michael Chan
2014-08-21 1:23 ` Benjamin Poirier
2014-08-21 9:51 ` Michael Chan
2014-08-21 21:59 ` Benjamin Poirier [this message]
2014-08-22 4:25 ` David Miller
2014-08-19 18:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] tg3: Fix tx_pending check for MAX_SKB_FRAGS Benjamin Poirier
2014-08-19 22:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] tg3: Limit minimum tx queue wakeup threshold Michael Chan
2014-08-21 22:04 ` Benjamin Poirier
2014-08-21 22:32 ` Michael Chan
2014-08-21 23:06 ` Benjamin Poirier
2014-08-21 23:26 ` Michael Chan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140821215911.GA7117@f1.synalogic.ca \
--to=bpoirier@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prashant@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).