From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: therbert@google.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/8] net: Clarification of CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:40:01 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140827.144001.80733091766338046.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+mtBx9GvHpLJ718hV5BjRGjfWvmXB55hKa3Rwo=6me3f0M3Dw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:47:35 -0700
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 6:13 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>>> From: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
>>>
>>>> @@ -569,16 +590,13 @@ struct sk_buff {
>>>> __u8 wifi_acked:1;
>>>> __u8 no_fcs:1;
>>>> __u8 head_frag:1;
>>>> - /* Encapsulation protocol and NIC drivers should use
>>>> - * this flag to indicate to each other if the skb contains
>>>> - * encapsulated packet or not and maybe use the inner packet
>>>> - * headers if needed
>>>> - */
>>>> + /* Indicates the the inner headers are valid in the skbuff. */
>>>> __u8 encapsulation:1;
>>>> __u8 encap_hdr_csum:1;
>>>> __u8 csum_valid:1;
>>>> __u8 csum_complete_sw:1;
>>>> - /* 2/4 bit hole (depending on ndisc_nodetype presence) */
>>>> + __u8 csum_level:2;
>>>> + /* 0/2 bit hole (depending on ndisc_nodetype presence) */
>>>> kmemcheck_bitfield_end(flags2);
>>>
>>> Crap, with xmit_more, this actually bleeds us over into a new __u8.
>>
>> We'll undoubtably want to add more flags beyond that (they're quite
>> useful). I'll try to find some more space in the existing fields so we
>> don't increase skbuf size.
>
> Actually, from inner_protocol through mac_header there are seven 16
> bit fields, could put another 16 bit flags there.
Ok, please resubmit this series with that change.
Meanwhile I fixed up the comment so that it's accurate again, like so:
====================
Subject: [PATCH] net: Update sk_buff flag bit availability comment.
We lost one when xmit_more was added.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
include/linux/skbuff.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
index 9b3802a..b69b7b5 100644
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ struct sk_buff {
__u8 encap_hdr_csum:1;
__u8 csum_valid:1;
__u8 csum_complete_sw:1;
- /* 2/4 bit hole (depending on ndisc_nodetype presence) */
+ /* 1/3 bit hole (depending on ndisc_nodetype presence) */
kmemcheck_bitfield_end(flags2);
#if defined CONFIG_NET_DMA || defined CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
--
1.7.11.7
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-27 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-26 0:55 [PATCH net-next 1/8] net: Clarification of CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY Tom Herbert
2014-08-26 1:13 ` David Miller
2014-08-26 1:40 ` Tom Herbert
2014-08-26 1:47 ` Tom Herbert
2014-08-27 21:40 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140827.144001.80733091766338046.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).