netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, therbert@google.com, jhs@mojatatu.com,
	hannes@stressinduktion.org, edumazet@google.com,
	jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
	dborkman@redhat.com, brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Get rid of ndo_xmit_flush
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:19:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140827141918.198cba38@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140825.163458.1117073971092495452.davem@davemloft.net>

On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 16:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:

> Given Jesper's performance numbers, it's not the way to go.
> 
> Instead, go with a signalling scheme via new boolean skb->xmit_more.
> 
> This has several advantages:
> 
> 1) Nearly trivial driver support, just protect the tail pointer
>    update with the skb->xmit_more check.
> 
> 2) No extra indirect calls in the non-deferral cases.

Even-though it is obvious that this new API skb->xmit_more will not
hurt performance, especially given skb->xmit_more is always 0 in this
kernel, I've still run my pktgen performance tests.

Compared to baseline[1]: (averaged 5609929 pps) (details below signature)
 * (1/5609929*10^9)-(1/5603728*10^9) = -0.197ns

As expected, this API does not hurt performance (as -0.197ns is below
our accuracy levels).

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/327254/focus=327838
-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
  Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

Results: on branch bulking02
----------------------------

Kernel with skb->xmit_more API.

Kernel at:
 * commit a3d1214688d ("neigh: document gc_thresh2")

With no HT:
 * ethtool -C eth5 rx-usecs 30
 * tuned-adm profile latency-performance
Results (pktgen):
 * instant rx:1 tx:5604056 pps n:250 average: rx:1 tx:5604013 pps
  (instant variation TX 0.001 ns (min:-0.114 max:0.104) RX 0.000 ns)
 * instant rx:1 tx:5603388 pps n:87 average: rx:1 tx:5603872 pps
  (instant variation TX -0.015 ns (min:-0.031 max:0.060) RX 0.000 ns)
 * instant rx:1 tx:5604332 pps n:429 average: rx:1 tx:5603300 pps
  (instant variation TX 0.033 ns (min:-0.094 max:0.881) RX 0.000 ns)
 * Average: (5604013+5603872+5603300)/3 = 5603728

Compared to baseline: (averaged 5609929 pps)
 * (1/5609929*10^9)-(1/5603728*10^9) = -0.197ns

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-27 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-25 23:34 [PATCH 0/2] Get rid of ndo_xmit_flush David Miller
2014-08-26  6:28 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-08-26 10:13   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-08-26 12:52     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-08-26 16:43       ` Alexander Duyck
2014-08-27  7:48         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-08-27  8:37           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-08-26 14:40     ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2014-09-01  0:37     ` Rusty Russell
2014-08-27 12:19 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2014-08-27 20:43   ` David Miller
2014-08-27 12:31 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-08-27 13:23   ` Eric Dumazet
2014-08-27 13:56     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-08-27 14:09       ` Eric Dumazet
2014-08-27 20:48       ` David Miller
2014-08-27 20:46     ` David Miller
2014-08-27 20:45   ` David Miller
2014-08-28  1:42     ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-08-30  3:22       ` David Miller
2014-08-30 10:23         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-01 20:05         ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-01 21:56           ` David Miller
2014-09-01 22:31             ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-01 22:35               ` David Miller
2014-08-27 18:28 ` Cong Wang
2014-08-27 19:31   ` Tom Herbert
2014-08-27 20:53     ` David Miller
2014-08-27 20:51   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140827141918.198cba38@redhat.com \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).