netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Cc: Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>,
	Tommi Rantala <tt.rantala@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	trinity@vger.kernel.org, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v2] ipv6: fix rtnl locking in setsockopt for anycast and multicast
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:29:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140902082929.GA8483@kria> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409610378.21965.52.camel@localhost>

Calling setsockopt with IPV6_JOIN_ANYCAST or IPV6_LEAVE_ANYCAST
triggers the assertion in addrconf_join_solict()/addrconf_leave_solict()

ipv6_sock_ac_join(), ipv6_sock_ac_drop(), ipv6_sock_ac_close() need to
take RTNL before calling ipv6_dev_ac_inc/dec. Same thing with
ipv6_sock_mc_join(), ipv6_sock_mc_drop(), ipv6_sock_mc_close() before
calling ipv6_dev_mc_inc/dec.

This patch moves ASSERT_RTNL() up a level in the call stack.

Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Reported-by: Tommi Rantala <tt.rantala@gmail.com>
---
As was said earlier, this should go in stable.

v2:
 - based on net
 - keep dev_get_by_flags_rcu and RCU in ipv6_sock_ac_*
 - remove two ASSERT_RTNL() that are not necessary

Thank you for your help, Hannes!

 net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 15 +++++----------
 net/ipv6/anycast.c  | 12 ++++++++++++
 net/ipv6/mcast.c    | 14 ++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 0b239fc1816e..aa0e135b808c 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -1690,14 +1690,12 @@ void addrconf_dad_failure(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp)
 	addrconf_mod_dad_work(ifp, 0);
 }
 
-/* Join to solicited addr multicast group. */
-
+/* Join to solicited addr multicast group.
+ * caller must hold RTNL */
 void addrconf_join_solict(struct net_device *dev, const struct in6_addr *addr)
 {
 	struct in6_addr maddr;
 
-	ASSERT_RTNL();
-
 	if (dev->flags&(IFF_LOOPBACK|IFF_NOARP))
 		return;
 
@@ -1705,12 +1703,11 @@ void addrconf_join_solict(struct net_device *dev, const struct in6_addr *addr)
 	ipv6_dev_mc_inc(dev, &maddr);
 }
 
+/* caller must hold RTNL */
 void addrconf_leave_solict(struct inet6_dev *idev, const struct in6_addr *addr)
 {
 	struct in6_addr maddr;
 
-	ASSERT_RTNL();
-
 	if (idev->dev->flags&(IFF_LOOPBACK|IFF_NOARP))
 		return;
 
@@ -1718,12 +1715,11 @@ void addrconf_leave_solict(struct inet6_dev *idev, const struct in6_addr *addr)
 	__ipv6_dev_mc_dec(idev, &maddr);
 }
 
+/* caller must hold RTNL */
 static void addrconf_join_anycast(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp)
 {
 	struct in6_addr addr;
 
-	ASSERT_RTNL();
-
 	if (ifp->prefix_len >= 127) /* RFC 6164 */
 		return;
 	ipv6_addr_prefix(&addr, &ifp->addr, ifp->prefix_len);
@@ -1732,12 +1728,11 @@ static void addrconf_join_anycast(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp)
 	ipv6_dev_ac_inc(ifp->idev->dev, &addr);
 }
 
+/* caller must hold RTNL */
 static void addrconf_leave_anycast(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp)
 {
 	struct in6_addr addr;
 
-	ASSERT_RTNL();
-
 	if (ifp->prefix_len >= 127) /* RFC 6164 */
 		return;
 	ipv6_addr_prefix(&addr, &ifp->addr, ifp->prefix_len);
diff --git a/net/ipv6/anycast.c b/net/ipv6/anycast.c
index 210183244689..45b9d81d91e8 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/anycast.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/anycast.c
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ int ipv6_sock_ac_join(struct sock *sk, int ifindex, const struct in6_addr *addr)
 	pac->acl_next = NULL;
 	pac->acl_addr = *addr;
 
+	rtnl_lock();
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	if (ifindex == 0) {
 		struct rt6_info *rt;
@@ -137,6 +138,7 @@ int ipv6_sock_ac_join(struct sock *sk, int ifindex, const struct in6_addr *addr)
 
 error:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
+	rtnl_unlock();
 	if (pac)
 		sock_kfree_s(sk, pac, sizeof(*pac));
 	return err;
@@ -171,13 +173,17 @@ int ipv6_sock_ac_drop(struct sock *sk, int ifindex, const struct in6_addr *addr)
 
 	spin_unlock_bh(&ipv6_sk_ac_lock);
 
+	rtnl_lock();
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, pac->acl_ifindex);
 	if (dev)
 		ipv6_dev_ac_dec(dev, &pac->acl_addr);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
+	rtnl_unlock();
 
 	sock_kfree_s(sk, pac, sizeof(*pac));
+	if (!dev)
+		return -ENODEV;
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -198,6 +204,7 @@ void ipv6_sock_ac_close(struct sock *sk)
 	spin_unlock_bh(&ipv6_sk_ac_lock);
 
 	prev_index = 0;
+	rtnl_lock();
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	while (pac) {
 		struct ipv6_ac_socklist *next = pac->acl_next;
@@ -212,6 +219,7 @@ void ipv6_sock_ac_close(struct sock *sk)
 		pac = next;
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
+	rtnl_unlock();
 }
 
 static void aca_put(struct ifacaddr6 *ac)
@@ -233,6 +241,8 @@ int ipv6_dev_ac_inc(struct net_device *dev, const struct in6_addr *addr)
 	struct rt6_info *rt;
 	int err;
 
+	ASSERT_RTNL();
+
 	idev = in6_dev_get(dev);
 
 	if (idev == NULL)
@@ -302,6 +312,8 @@ int __ipv6_dev_ac_dec(struct inet6_dev *idev, const struct in6_addr *addr)
 {
 	struct ifacaddr6 *aca, *prev_aca;
 
+	ASSERT_RTNL();
+
 	write_lock_bh(&idev->lock);
 	prev_aca = NULL;
 	for (aca = idev->ac_list; aca; aca = aca->aca_next) {
diff --git a/net/ipv6/mcast.c b/net/ipv6/mcast.c
index 617f0958e164..a23b655a7627 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/mcast.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/mcast.c
@@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ int ipv6_sock_mc_join(struct sock *sk, int ifindex, const struct in6_addr *addr)
 	mc_lst->next = NULL;
 	mc_lst->addr = *addr;
 
+	rtnl_lock();
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	if (ifindex == 0) {
 		struct rt6_info *rt;
@@ -185,6 +186,7 @@ int ipv6_sock_mc_join(struct sock *sk, int ifindex, const struct in6_addr *addr)
 
 	if (dev == NULL) {
 		rcu_read_unlock();
+		rtnl_unlock();
 		sock_kfree_s(sk, mc_lst, sizeof(*mc_lst));
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
@@ -202,6 +204,7 @@ int ipv6_sock_mc_join(struct sock *sk, int ifindex, const struct in6_addr *addr)
 
 	if (err) {
 		rcu_read_unlock();
+		rtnl_unlock();
 		sock_kfree_s(sk, mc_lst, sizeof(*mc_lst));
 		return err;
 	}
@@ -212,6 +215,7 @@ int ipv6_sock_mc_join(struct sock *sk, int ifindex, const struct in6_addr *addr)
 	spin_unlock(&ipv6_sk_mc_lock);
 
 	rcu_read_unlock();
+	rtnl_unlock();
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -229,6 +233,7 @@ int ipv6_sock_mc_drop(struct sock *sk, int ifindex, const struct in6_addr *addr)
 	if (!ipv6_addr_is_multicast(addr))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	rtnl_lock();
 	spin_lock(&ipv6_sk_mc_lock);
 	for (lnk = &np->ipv6_mc_list;
 	     (mc_lst = rcu_dereference_protected(*lnk,
@@ -252,12 +257,15 @@ int ipv6_sock_mc_drop(struct sock *sk, int ifindex, const struct in6_addr *addr)
 			} else
 				(void) ip6_mc_leave_src(sk, mc_lst, NULL);
 			rcu_read_unlock();
+			rtnl_unlock();
+
 			atomic_sub(sizeof(*mc_lst), &sk->sk_omem_alloc);
 			kfree_rcu(mc_lst, rcu);
 			return 0;
 		}
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&ipv6_sk_mc_lock);
+	rtnl_unlock();
 
 	return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
 }
@@ -302,6 +310,7 @@ void ipv6_sock_mc_close(struct sock *sk)
 	if (!rcu_access_pointer(np->ipv6_mc_list))
 		return;
 
+	rtnl_lock();
 	spin_lock(&ipv6_sk_mc_lock);
 	while ((mc_lst = rcu_dereference_protected(np->ipv6_mc_list,
 				lockdep_is_held(&ipv6_sk_mc_lock))) != NULL) {
@@ -328,6 +337,7 @@ void ipv6_sock_mc_close(struct sock *sk)
 		spin_lock(&ipv6_sk_mc_lock);
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&ipv6_sk_mc_lock);
+	rtnl_unlock();
 }
 
 int ip6_mc_source(int add, int omode, struct sock *sk,
@@ -845,6 +855,8 @@ int ipv6_dev_mc_inc(struct net_device *dev, const struct in6_addr *addr)
 	struct ifmcaddr6 *mc;
 	struct inet6_dev *idev;
 
+	ASSERT_RTNL();
+
 	/* we need to take a reference on idev */
 	idev = in6_dev_get(dev);
 
@@ -916,6 +928,8 @@ int __ipv6_dev_mc_dec(struct inet6_dev *idev, const struct in6_addr *addr)
 {
 	struct ifmcaddr6 *ma, **map;
 
+	ASSERT_RTNL();
+
 	write_lock_bh(&idev->lock);
 	for (map = &idev->mc_list; (ma=*map) != NULL; map = &ma->next) {
 		if (ipv6_addr_equal(&ma->mca_addr, addr)) {
-- 
2.1.0

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-02  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-29 15:26 RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv6/addrconf.c (1699) Tommi Rantala
2014-08-29 16:17 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-08-29 18:14 ` Cong Wang
2014-08-29 19:53   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2014-08-29 22:54     ` Cong Wang
2014-08-30 10:50       ` Sabrina Dubroca
2014-08-30  1:51     ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-08-30 10:58       ` Sabrina Dubroca
2014-08-30 17:11         ` Sabrina Dubroca
2014-09-01 19:22         ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-01 21:05           ` [PATCH] ipv6: fix rtnl locking in setsockopt for anycast and multicast Sabrina Dubroca
2014-09-01 22:26             ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-02  8:29               ` Sabrina Dubroca [this message]
2014-09-02 10:07                 ` [PATCH net v2] " Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-02 16:43                 ` Cong Wang
2014-09-05 18:53                 ` David Miller
2014-09-05 18:58                   ` Cong Wang
2014-09-05 19:12                     ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-05 19:23                       ` Cong Wang
2014-09-05 19:25                         ` David Miller
2014-09-05 19:34                           ` Cong Wang
2014-09-05 19:21                     ` David Miller
2014-09-02 16:50       ` RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv6/addrconf.c (1699) Cong Wang
2014-09-02 17:58         ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-02 18:04           ` Cong Wang
2014-09-02 18:11             ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-02 18:15               ` Cong Wang
2014-09-02 18:21                 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-02 18:37                   ` Cong Wang
2014-09-02 19:08                 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-09-02 18:18             ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-02 18:40               ` Cong Wang
2014-09-02 19:02                 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-02 19:18                   ` Cong Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140902082929.GA8483@kria \
    --to=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=cwang@twopensource.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trinity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tt.rantala@gmail.com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).