From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
To: Raghuram Kothakota <Raghuram.Kothakota@oracle.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] sunvnet: Re-check for a VIO_DESC_READY data descriptor after short udelay()
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 12:56:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140902165659.GH31516@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <665366D4-384B-45E1-B371-239EA87F5A15@oracle.com>
On (09/02/14 09:43), Raghuram Kothakota wrote:
> We could optimize this a bit by not wait for normal traffic, I mean,
> non-burst traffic
> and apply the retry only when we detect a stream of packets?
How could you tell the difference efficiently? You'd need to
track some kind of history/state for inter-packet arrival time.
All seems like over-kill (more useful to go and optimize other
parts of the system, such as do less work in interrupt context).
> We could detect a stream based on how many packets are picked
> up in this function, picking up 3 or more could be considered as a stream,
> of course tune based on testing.
>
> You probably tried it already, but checking to see if you tried with
> less number
> of iterations, we could reduce the iterations if the numbers are equally good
> with less iterations.
yes, the 3 * 4 micro-seconds was arrived at heuristically.
--Sowmini
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-02 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-29 20:18 [PATCH net-next 2/2] sunvnet: Re-check for a VIO_DESC_READY data descriptor after short udelay() Sowmini Varadhan
2014-09-02 3:47 ` David Miller
2014-09-02 10:27 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2014-09-02 16:43 ` Raghuram Kothakota
2014-09-02 16:56 ` Sowmini Varadhan [this message]
2014-09-02 17:33 ` Raghuram Kothakota
2014-09-02 20:59 ` David Miller
2014-09-03 17:12 ` Sowmini Varadhan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140902165659.GH31516@oracle.com \
--to=sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com \
--cc=Raghuram.Kothakota@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).